Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Who had some .100 pitch ball screws FS??
Posted by
Jon Anderson
on 2003-10-22 09:49:14 UTC
Graham Hollis wrote:
yield a deviation smaller yet. Close enough that virtually nobody would
be able to tell the difference between a .100 and a 2.5mm pitch screw
visually checking with calipers. Thanks for cleaning up my math a bit!
Jon
>I'd just pulled that number off a conversion factor chart. Your numbers
> The problem comes in you're using 0.0394 instead of 0.039370079
> which is arrived at by 1/25.4
yield a deviation smaller yet. Close enough that virtually nobody would
be able to tell the difference between a .100 and a 2.5mm pitch screw
visually checking with calipers. Thanks for cleaning up my math a bit!
Jon
Discussion Thread
Jon Anderson
2003-10-21 15:46:36 UTC
Who had some .100 pitch ball screws FS??
jmorrphd2
2003-10-21 17:53:14 UTC
Re: Who had some .100 pitch ball screws FS??
Jon Anderson
2003-10-21 18:20:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Who had some .100 pitch ball screws FS??
jmorrphd2
2003-10-21 21:34:50 UTC
Re: Who had some .100 pitch ball screws FS??
Jon Elson
2003-10-21 22:39:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Who had some .100 pitch ball screws FS??
skykotech
2003-10-22 08:16:49 UTC
Re: Who had some .100 pitch ball screws FS??
Jon Anderson
2003-10-22 08:49:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Who had some .100 pitch ball screws FS??
Graham Hollis
2003-10-22 09:05:52 UTC
Re: Who had some .100 pitch ball screws FS??
Jon Anderson
2003-10-22 09:49:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Who had some .100 pitch ball screws FS??
John Johnson
2003-10-22 12:11:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Who had some .100 pitch ball screws FS??
Graham Hollis
2003-10-22 13:11:03 UTC
Cleaning up math (was Who had some .100 pitch ball screws FS??)