Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: motor advise needed
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2003-11-10 22:21:54 UTC
piggy wrote:
encoder resolution. The only purpose it so make a poor match between
motors with high resolution encoders and programs which have trouble
generating step pulses fast. (Well, it also smooths out the step pulses,
which is of interest with steppers, but is not a big concern with the
servo drives.)
Jon
>Why the 340's?It multiplies the step pulses, which has the same effect as dividing the
>
>i dont know why for certain .
> seems to me i read that there are more options to divide the encoder signal
>? or is it mutiply lol
>i am quite uneducated about this although i have been reading everything i
>can get my hands on for 6 months.
>
>
encoder resolution. The only purpose it so make a poor match between
motors with high resolution encoders and programs which have trouble
generating step pulses fast. (Well, it also smooths out the step pulses,
which is of interest with steppers, but is not a big concern with the
servo drives.)
Jon
Discussion Thread
Don Thigpen
2003-11-10 15:58:12 UTC
motor advise needed
volitan712003
2003-11-10 17:06:45 UTC
Re: motor advise needed
Dave Fisher
2003-11-10 21:05:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] motor advise needed
piggy
2003-11-10 21:05:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: motor advise needed
Jon Elson
2003-11-10 21:50:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] motor advise needed
Jon Elson
2003-11-10 22:21:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: motor advise needed
Tim Goldstein
2003-11-11 00:42:51 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: motor advise needed