Re: Re Router / Mill
    Posted by
    
      metlmunchr
    
  
  
    on 2004-01-20 15:44:38 UTC
  
  Dave, the main differences which come to mind are spindle size and 
speed and machine rigidity. For comparison purposes, it would
probably be easy to build a gantry type cnc router with 40"x20"
travels weighing in at less than 750 lbs. Mazak built a nice 40x20
gantry type cnc mill for a while which weighs about 15,000 lbs, or
20 times as much as our router. When you look at the comparative
strengths of the materials which these two machines will be cutting,
and accuracy required, there's a fairly good correlation between
these numbers and the comparative mass of the machines required to
successfully work the materials. Without getting into an off topic
discussion of the intricacies of all the various differences between
a mill and a router, suffice it to say that, while the machines may
share the same concept, there are few other real similarities of
detail. Each has its purpose, and each is a poor imitation of the
other when you attempt to use them for other than their intended
purpose.
Cliff
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Fisher" <dave@d...>
wrote:
speed and machine rigidity. For comparison purposes, it would
probably be easy to build a gantry type cnc router with 40"x20"
travels weighing in at less than 750 lbs. Mazak built a nice 40x20
gantry type cnc mill for a while which weighs about 15,000 lbs, or
20 times as much as our router. When you look at the comparative
strengths of the materials which these two machines will be cutting,
and accuracy required, there's a fairly good correlation between
these numbers and the comparative mass of the machines required to
successfully work the materials. Without getting into an off topic
discussion of the intricacies of all the various differences between
a mill and a router, suffice it to say that, while the machines may
share the same concept, there are few other real similarities of
detail. Each has its purpose, and each is a poor imitation of the
other when you attempt to use them for other than their intended
purpose.
Cliff
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Fisher" <dave@d...>
wrote:
> In planning a new website for general access, showing and detailingcould ask any
> the ongoing progress of our DIY router / mill - I wonder if I
> members of
> this group to advise me, as to what defines a Router as opposed
> to Mill ? or in fact vice versa ?
Discussion Thread
  
    onthemarcxyz
  
2004-01-18 00:31:31 UTC
  cable drive for X axis
  
    John Johnson
  
2004-01-18 05:54:55 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cable drive for X axis
  
    Richard L. Wurdack
  
2004-01-18 07:27:57 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cable drive for X axis
  
    Harvey White
  
2004-01-18 10:24:22 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cable drive for X axis
  
    onthemarcxyz
  
2004-01-19 07:14:50 UTC
  Re: cable drive for X axis
  
    ballendo
  
2004-01-20 08:02:32 UTC
  Alternatives to... Re: cable drive for X axis
  
    Dave Fisher
  
2004-01-20 11:11:59 UTC
  RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re Router / Mill
  
    Bob McKnight
  
2004-01-20 11:34:39 UTC
  RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re Router / Mill
  
    metlmunchr
  
2004-01-20 15:44:38 UTC
  Re: Re Router / Mill
  
    John Johnson
  
2004-01-20 17:50:49 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cable drive for X axis
  
    ballendo
  
2004-01-21 07:52:08 UTC
  Re: Re Router / Mill
  
    ballendo
  
2004-01-21 07:53:09 UTC
  Re: cable drive for X axis
  
    Dave Fisher
  
2004-01-21 09:15:03 UTC
  RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re Router / Mill
  
    C.S. Mo
  
2004-01-21 10:10:16 UTC
  RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re Router / Mill
  
    Torsten
  
2004-01-21 15:26:02 UTC
  Re: Re Router / Mill
  
    Jon Elson
  
2004-01-21 20:44:08 UTC
  Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re Router / Mill
  
    Indy123456
  
2004-01-22 10:30:05 UTC
  Re: Re Router / Mill