Re: Re Router / Mill
Posted by
metlmunchr
on 2004-01-20 15:44:38 UTC
Dave, the main differences which come to mind are spindle size and
speed and machine rigidity. For comparison purposes, it would
probably be easy to build a gantry type cnc router with 40"x20"
travels weighing in at less than 750 lbs. Mazak built a nice 40x20
gantry type cnc mill for a while which weighs about 15,000 lbs, or
20 times as much as our router. When you look at the comparative
strengths of the materials which these two machines will be cutting,
and accuracy required, there's a fairly good correlation between
these numbers and the comparative mass of the machines required to
successfully work the materials. Without getting into an off topic
discussion of the intricacies of all the various differences between
a mill and a router, suffice it to say that, while the machines may
share the same concept, there are few other real similarities of
detail. Each has its purpose, and each is a poor imitation of the
other when you attempt to use them for other than their intended
purpose.
Cliff
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Fisher" <dave@d...>
wrote:
speed and machine rigidity. For comparison purposes, it would
probably be easy to build a gantry type cnc router with 40"x20"
travels weighing in at less than 750 lbs. Mazak built a nice 40x20
gantry type cnc mill for a while which weighs about 15,000 lbs, or
20 times as much as our router. When you look at the comparative
strengths of the materials which these two machines will be cutting,
and accuracy required, there's a fairly good correlation between
these numbers and the comparative mass of the machines required to
successfully work the materials. Without getting into an off topic
discussion of the intricacies of all the various differences between
a mill and a router, suffice it to say that, while the machines may
share the same concept, there are few other real similarities of
detail. Each has its purpose, and each is a poor imitation of the
other when you attempt to use them for other than their intended
purpose.
Cliff
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Fisher" <dave@d...>
wrote:
> In planning a new website for general access, showing and detailingcould ask any
> the ongoing progress of our DIY router / mill - I wonder if I
> members of
> this group to advise me, as to what defines a Router as opposed
> to Mill ? or in fact vice versa ?
Discussion Thread
onthemarcxyz
2004-01-18 00:31:31 UTC
cable drive for X axis
John Johnson
2004-01-18 05:54:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cable drive for X axis
Richard L. Wurdack
2004-01-18 07:27:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cable drive for X axis
Harvey White
2004-01-18 10:24:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] cable drive for X axis
onthemarcxyz
2004-01-19 07:14:50 UTC
Re: cable drive for X axis
ballendo
2004-01-20 08:02:32 UTC
Alternatives to... Re: cable drive for X axis
Dave Fisher
2004-01-20 11:11:59 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re Router / Mill
Bob McKnight
2004-01-20 11:34:39 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re Router / Mill
metlmunchr
2004-01-20 15:44:38 UTC
Re: Re Router / Mill
John Johnson
2004-01-20 17:50:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: cable drive for X axis
ballendo
2004-01-21 07:52:08 UTC
Re: Re Router / Mill
ballendo
2004-01-21 07:53:09 UTC
Re: cable drive for X axis
Dave Fisher
2004-01-21 09:15:03 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re Router / Mill
C.S. Mo
2004-01-21 10:10:16 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re Router / Mill
Torsten
2004-01-21 15:26:02 UTC
Re: Re Router / Mill
Jon Elson
2004-01-21 20:44:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re Router / Mill
Indy123456
2004-01-22 10:30:05 UTC
Re: Re Router / Mill