Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Helix Angle
Posted by
Terry Owens
on 2004-03-10 09:26:02 UTC
Hi,
Thank you for the replies but they don't help as everyone came up with a
different answer.
What I'm trying to do is cut a 3 start helical slot around an aluminium bar
to make couplings for stepper motors. The way I would machine them is to
hold them in the lathe chuck and use a slitting saw in a milling spindle set
at the helix angle of the slot, which happens to be 8 TPI. This is easy to
do, once I have the helix angle, but not very productive. As I wanted to
manufacture a lot of these couplings, of different sizes, I have designed a
jig which consists of a screwed threaded bar which the part to be machined
is locked to. The threaded bar is used to advance the part to a slitting saw
held in a horizontal miller but the jig must be set at the helix angle.
All the machining is easy once I have the helix angle but drawing the slot
in ACAD is a different matter. I tried to do it all day yesterday with
results that didn't please me. I draw it the same way I machine it, not
forgetting I got a different angle to all of the posts :-)
As to the question why 18mm with an 8 TPI thread. I'm English and come from
that generation that had to learn measurements ambidextrously and as such I
think in imperial and draw in metric. I machine in either depending on the
machines scales. Metal here can come as imperial or metric and one is often
sold for the other. If I order 3/4" I'll sometimes get 19mm or visa versa.
The 18mm measurement was after machining a 19mm or 3/4" bar to 18mm.
Anyway my question is still the same, which of us is right. The thread I'll
be using will be square or acme form.
Regards,
Terry
Thank you for the replies but they don't help as everyone came up with a
different answer.
What I'm trying to do is cut a 3 start helical slot around an aluminium bar
to make couplings for stepper motors. The way I would machine them is to
hold them in the lathe chuck and use a slitting saw in a milling spindle set
at the helix angle of the slot, which happens to be 8 TPI. This is easy to
do, once I have the helix angle, but not very productive. As I wanted to
manufacture a lot of these couplings, of different sizes, I have designed a
jig which consists of a screwed threaded bar which the part to be machined
is locked to. The threaded bar is used to advance the part to a slitting saw
held in a horizontal miller but the jig must be set at the helix angle.
All the machining is easy once I have the helix angle but drawing the slot
in ACAD is a different matter. I tried to do it all day yesterday with
results that didn't please me. I draw it the same way I machine it, not
forgetting I got a different angle to all of the posts :-)
As to the question why 18mm with an 8 TPI thread. I'm English and come from
that generation that had to learn measurements ambidextrously and as such I
think in imperial and draw in metric. I machine in either depending on the
machines scales. Metal here can come as imperial or metric and one is often
sold for the other. If I order 3/4" I'll sometimes get 19mm or visa versa.
The 18mm measurement was after machining a 19mm or 3/4" bar to 18mm.
Anyway my question is still the same, which of us is right. The thread I'll
be using will be square or acme form.
Regards,
Terry
> You'll be soooo pleased to know that the helix angle of the thread tip
> and root are not the same!
> To see how to calculate the angle, imagine a piece of paper wrapped
> around the appropriate diameter (root or tip or anywhere in between). If
> you trace the helix to the paper, along with a circumference line
> (straight around) and one lengthwise, then unwrap the paper and flatten
> in. The three lines will (if you connected them right) form a triangle.
> The line that was the lengthwise one will be the thread lead distance.
> The line that was the circumference will have a length equal to the
> circumference (duh!).
> These two lines form a right angle.
> The hypoteneuse is the helix line. The tangent of its angle will be the
> thread lead divided by the circumference.
> Thus for the thread tip, the angle will be arctan(0.125/(pi*0.7087)),
> which is 3.2134 degrees.
> For the thread root the angle will be
> arctan(0.125/(pi*(0.7087-0.125*tan(60)))), which is 4.6217 degrees.
>
> Although I'm not sure why you need this to generate a CAD model for the
> helix...
> -Kevin Martin
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terry Owens [mailto:terry@...]
> [...]
> This may at first sight appaer to be off-topic but it isn't. I nned to
> know the answer so I can draw it in CAD to make a part for a CNC
> machine.
Discussion Thread
Terry Owens
2004-03-09 15:09:11 UTC
Helix Angle
rawen2
2004-03-09 17:14:53 UTC
Re: Helix Angle
rawen2
2004-03-09 17:22:03 UTC
Re: Helix Angle
rawen2
2004-03-09 18:07:51 UTC
Re: Helix Angle
Kevin Martin
2004-03-09 18:58:06 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Helix Angle
Raymond Heckert
2004-03-09 19:13:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Helix Angle
Terry Owens
2004-03-10 09:26:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Helix Angle
Terry Owens
2004-03-10 09:48:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Helix Angle
david_margrave
2004-03-10 10:58:20 UTC
Re: Helix Angle
John Johnson
2004-03-10 12:50:53 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Helix Angle
Marcus
2004-03-10 17:57:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Helix Angle
Raymond Heckert
2004-03-10 20:09:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Helix Angle
Terry Owens
2004-03-11 07:36:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Helix Angle
ballendo
2004-03-11 09:09:45 UTC
motor couplers was Re: Helix Angle
Raymond Heckert
2004-03-11 20:30:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Helix Angle
Raymond Heckert
2004-03-11 20:30:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Helix Angle