Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: servomotor suitability???
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2004-03-15 20:26:11 UTC
>Well, this is pretty iffy for a 200 Lb gantry. It is rated at 9.1
>--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Erie Patsellis <erie@s...>
>wrote:
>
>
>>has anyone looked at *C&H surpus #DCME9850???*
>>
>>**
>>
>>
Oz-In/Amp,
with a 6.6 A rating listed. The peak current might be higher, I don't
know. But, 6.6 A * 9.1 is only 60 Oz-In. That seems too small for the
peak rating, though. The very low rotor inertial suggests this is probably
an ironless rotor motor. Not a good match for driving heavy machinery,
more likely for moving tape in a tape drive.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Erie Patsellis
2004-03-15 13:19:17 UTC
servomotor suitability???
caudlet
2004-03-15 14:26:42 UTC
Re: servomotor suitability???
sdfine@d...
2004-03-15 16:46:34 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: servomotor suitability???
Kim Lux
2004-03-15 16:47:16 UTC
Request for assistance with Gecko and LARGE servo motor...
caudlet
2004-03-15 20:07:23 UTC
Re: servomotor suitability???
Jon Elson
2004-03-15 20:20:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: servomotor suitability???
Jon Elson
2004-03-15 20:26:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: servomotor suitability???
Jon Elson
2004-03-15 20:41:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Request for assistance with Gecko and LARGE servo motor...
Erie Patsellis
2004-03-16 06:03:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: servomotor suitability???
caudlet
2004-03-16 12:05:39 UTC
Re: servomotor suitability???