Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G_Code sharing
Posted by
Alan Marconett KM6VV
on 2004-04-29 12:21:55 UTC
Hi Doug,
I wrote my own controller, STEP4, and I put in what I call a
"conversational screen" to directly run the mill/lathe (and generate
Gcode). I have a pocket routine, and I'm looking to add others. And of
course I have (and use) G81...G86 canned routines that I use to drill
and bore.
I don't think I need a "bolt circle" routine, but a few more routines
would be nice! I still generate multiple hole part programs, and
contour programs using Vector CAD/CAM. But I'm always on the lookout
for more "canned" routines to add to my controller.
The lathe should be a good opportunity to add canned cycles. The way I
see it, the lathe operations (that I need, anyway) are much simpler,
mostly turning diameters of a specified length. I'd like to find a good
list of desirable lathe canned cycles to study.
The programming isn't necessarily that much, as there is already a
wealth of positioning code already in the controller. Loops, variables
and conditional operators add considerable help, it should be possible
to load and run a canned cycle consisting of Gcode, and PASS it a set of
variables.
I'm open to thoughts!
Alan KM6VV
doug98105 wrote:
I wrote my own controller, STEP4, and I put in what I call a
"conversational screen" to directly run the mill/lathe (and generate
Gcode). I have a pocket routine, and I'm looking to add others. And of
course I have (and use) G81...G86 canned routines that I use to drill
and bore.
I don't think I need a "bolt circle" routine, but a few more routines
would be nice! I still generate multiple hole part programs, and
contour programs using Vector CAD/CAM. But I'm always on the lookout
for more "canned" routines to add to my controller.
The lathe should be a good opportunity to add canned cycles. The way I
see it, the lathe operations (that I need, anyway) are much simpler,
mostly turning diameters of a specified length. I'd like to find a good
list of desirable lathe canned cycles to study.
The programming isn't necessarily that much, as there is already a
wealth of positioning code already in the controller. Loops, variables
and conditional operators add considerable help, it should be possible
to load and run a canned cycle consisting of Gcode, and PASS it a set of
variables.
I'm open to thoughts!
Alan KM6VV
doug98105 wrote:
>
> Group,
>
> <SNIP>
>
> IMO, the hobby type controls (EMC, etc) would be made much more
> powerful by the addition of a variety of canned cycles beyond the
> typical drilling type. Of course, this involves substantial
> programming on the control-author's part.
>
Discussion Thread
bdrmachine
2004-04-25 14:39:54 UTC
G_Code sharing
Greg Nuspel
2004-04-25 14:45:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G_Code sharing
Vince Negrete
2004-04-25 16:23:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G_Code sharing
Ron K
2004-04-25 18:19:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G_Code sharing
Greg Nuspel
2004-04-25 20:05:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G_Code sharing
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2004-04-26 11:26:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G_Code sharing
Vince Negrete
2004-04-26 16:40:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G_Code sharing
Jon Elson
2004-04-28 22:09:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G_Code sharing
Ron K
2004-04-29 06:57:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G_Code sharing
hal_eckhart
2004-04-29 07:15:01 UTC
Re: G_Code sharing
doug98105
2004-04-29 08:02:50 UTC
Re: G_Code sharing
cnc002@a...
2004-04-29 09:59:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G_Code sharing
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2004-04-29 12:21:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G_Code sharing
ballendo
2004-04-30 06:50:49 UTC
Mach2 is as close to a commercial control as you can get without buyng one
tomp_tag
2004-05-02 21:29:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G_Code sharing