Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] No Torque (power?)
Posted by
Weyland
on 2004-05-20 18:55:54 UTC
On Thursday 20 May 2004 04:10 pm, Roy J. Tellason spake:
the fact that they have no torque when not even connected to the screws.
They're set up that way because I was
(and am) planning on 5 pitch ballscews later.
For right now, I know it'll be slower when it's
working, but right now, I just wanna get it working.
Thanks,
Weyland
> A bigger pulley on the motor and a smaller one on the leadscrew? TryI'm not so worried about that right at this moment, but rather more with
> putting these the other way around...
>
> > If I had to desribe it, I would say that the seem to not have any
> > torque...
>
> The way you describe having it set up is going to demand twice the torque
> of having the motor and leadscrew directly connected.
the fact that they have no torque when not even connected to the screws.
They're set up that way because I was
(and am) planning on 5 pitch ballscews later.
For right now, I know it'll be slower when it's
working, but right now, I just wanna get it working.
Thanks,
Weyland
Discussion Thread
Weyland
2004-05-20 10:24:43 UTC
No Torque (power?)
Andy Wander
2004-05-20 10:33:32 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] No Torque (power?)
Andy Wander
2004-05-20 10:35:37 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] No Torque (power?)
Roy J. Tellason
2004-05-20 13:08:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] No Torque (power?)
Weyland
2004-05-20 18:55:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] No Torque (power?)
Andy Wander
2004-05-20 19:02:36 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] No Torque (power?)
Weyland
2004-05-20 19:20:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] No Torque (power?)
Jon Elson
2004-05-20 22:04:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] No Torque (power?)
Nick Ibbitson
2004-05-21 01:37:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] No Torque (power?)