Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digitizing arms??
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2004-06-23 20:12:10 UTC
doug98105 wrote:
is that certain arm positions lead to poor accuracy, because a very small
movement of one joint makes a big change in position.
No doubt a 1000 cycle/rev, or even 2500 cycle/rev encoder would be
a HUGE improvement over the ancient Apple digitizer with pots.
Unless they used special pots, you couldn't possibly get better than
1% angular accuracy, and that is 3.6 degrees! Yikes!
I worked for a medical computer company in the WAY distant past,
and they made "Rho - Theta" and "Phi-Theta" digitizing arms using
very expensive mil-spec rotary and linear pots, and had all sorts of
trouble getting enough resolution with a 12-bit ADC to digitize
the location of a patient's tumors, etc. Linearity was no problem, as
the software had cal tables built for the individual digitizing arm.
Jon
>Group,Yeah, look at Faro for how they did it. The problem with these things
>
>Looking for some ideas on making a two axis digitizing arm.
>
>Back in the days of Apple II computers I saw a couple of crude
>digitizing arms built using potentiometers and inputting through the
>game controller input. Position was determined by the resistance
>readings.
>
>With high resolution encoder devices it seems like a much more
>accurate digitizer could be made.
>
>Any thoughts?
>
>
is that certain arm positions lead to poor accuracy, because a very small
movement of one joint makes a big change in position.
No doubt a 1000 cycle/rev, or even 2500 cycle/rev encoder would be
a HUGE improvement over the ancient Apple digitizer with pots.
Unless they used special pots, you couldn't possibly get better than
1% angular accuracy, and that is 3.6 degrees! Yikes!
I worked for a medical computer company in the WAY distant past,
and they made "Rho - Theta" and "Phi-Theta" digitizing arms using
very expensive mil-spec rotary and linear pots, and had all sorts of
trouble getting enough resolution with a 12-bit ADC to digitize
the location of a patient's tumors, etc. Linearity was no problem, as
the software had cal tables built for the individual digitizing arm.
Jon
Discussion Thread
doug98105
2004-06-23 09:43:57 UTC
Digitizing arms??
andycollins250
2004-06-23 12:43:09 UTC
Re: Digitizing arms??
Jon Elson
2004-06-23 20:12:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digitizing arms??
Mike Snodgrass
2004-06-24 06:18:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digitizing arms??
Alan Marconett
2004-06-24 11:02:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Digitizing arms??
Jason Spangle
2004-06-24 23:00:05 UTC
Re: Digitizing arms??
Mike Snodgrass
2004-06-25 05:55:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digitizing arms??
Harvey White
2004-06-25 07:29:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digitizing arms??
Jon Elson
2004-06-25 09:14:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digitizing arms??
Harvey White
2004-06-25 13:06:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Digitizing arms??
Jason Spangle
2004-06-25 21:07:08 UTC
Re: Digitizing arms??
k1hop
2004-06-26 09:04:45 UTC
Re: Digitizing arms??