Re: rotary encoder versus glass scales
Posted by
john_glynn57
on 2004-09-27 14:05:24 UTC
To this day very accurate machines use glass slides however these
machines usually fall into the toolmaking and measurement classes.
For most machining upto and including grinding precision direct
drives with encoders attached are used with recirculating ball
screws although you can also include a zero backlash gearbox into
the system and still maintain accuracy(Alpha gearboxes do one that
lasted us for 21 years and is still holding micron precision.
john
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "jcc3inc" <jccinc@o...>
wrote:
machines usually fall into the toolmaking and measurement classes.
For most machining upto and including grinding precision direct
drives with encoders attached are used with recirculating ball
screws although you can also include a zero backlash gearbox into
the system and still maintain accuracy(Alpha gearboxes do one that
lasted us for 21 years and is still holding micron precision.
john
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "jcc3inc" <jccinc@o...>
wrote:
> Steven:encoder
>
> Most CNC controllers these days use the signal from the motor
> as both position information AND rate feedback. They thus avoidby
> having an added tach on the motor. A system is easier to stabilize
> using the motor encoder as a tach instead of getting data from thethe
> table. However the best *position* feedback comes directly from
> table position via the glass scale; this is the most accurate asthe
> lost motion as well as the *springiness* of the mounts, bearings,etc
> are all included within the feedback loop. Therefore, if you wantmust
> the best accuracy, the glass scale on the table is best. Also, if
> the provious user managed to operate with that configuration, it
> have worked! A previous respondent indicated that a tightold
> recirculating ball preload did perform well on a PC drill.
>
> I think I'd give the table encoder a try!
>
> Regards,
> Jack C.
>
>
> > > I am in the process up gathering info and parts to upgrade an
> > > Hurco Bedmill to PC controls.I have ripped all the oldservo
> electronics
> > > off the machine cept motors and limit switchs ..I have new
> > > drivers in hand and just gotta get a coat of frsh paint on thethe
> > > machine and will be ready to wire something up....Cleaning on
> > > machine today I found that the X-axis motor's rotary encoderhad
> > beenbackside
> > > disconnected and somebody had installed a glass scale on
> > ofreading
> > > the bed for that axis.Reckon I should try to find a new rotary
> > > encoder or is the linear scale gonna be alright? I been
> > aboutkeep
> > > rotary optical encoders but havent a clue at the electrical
> > > differences between them and the linear scales..I want to
> > thisit
> > > simple where I can and save the sweat for the worthy
> > > problems..Hehhehehheh
> > > Then another question if somebody wants to take a stab at
> isOr
> > > why did the old controller make use of a tach signal from the
> > > servomotor and these PC run conversions dont use that signal?--
> > > maybe they do and I havent got to that part of the reading
> > > materials..This is my winter project and I got a lot to learn
> yet.I
> > > figure this isnt the last time I'll ask questions here.
> > > Thanks
> > > Steven
Discussion Thread
alphawolf45
2004-09-25 12:24:35 UTC
rotary encoder versus glass scales
pondindustrial
2004-09-25 13:25:19 UTC
Re: rotary encoder versus glass scales
alphawolf45
2004-09-25 13:55:50 UTC
Re: rotary encoder versus glass scales
afogassa
2004-09-25 15:59:20 UTC
Re: rotary encoder versus glass scales
jcc3inc
2004-09-27 06:34:04 UTC
Re: rotary encoder versus glass scales
john_glynn57
2004-09-27 14:05:24 UTC
Re: rotary encoder versus glass scales