Re: CPNC
Posted by
Ron Ginger
on 2000-05-13 18:22:22 UTC
> From: "Darrell" <dgehlsen@...>Absolutely not. I see CPNC doing Conversational Programming very well,
>Subject: Re: CPNC
>I don't want to start any flames but do you se your CPNC able to do
>everything that can be done with G code? If not then your example of someone
>learning on an AcuRite is like the example of learning on a simple machine
>and being forever limited instead of taking the effort to learn to do it
>right.
but not doing conventional CAM.CNC at all. This is a DIFFERENT tool. I
make no claim to BETTER, or DO IT RIGHT. Neither is RIGHT, each fits a
class of work better than the other.
I see CPNC aimed at a one-off job, at repair or modification work, and
at the Home Shop guy trying to make models.
On the other hand, I did decide to add a Gcode object to CPNC that was
not in my VB version or in AcuRite. It does allow one to drop in a block
of Gcode. Under EMC I assume we will be able to feed this to the emc
interpreter, but on a Win system with siple step type control it may not
be supported at all.
ron
Discussion Thread
Ray Henry
2000-05-04 11:24:05 UTC
CPNC
Ron Ginger
2000-05-04 13:15:55 UTC
RE: CPNC
Ron Ginger
2000-05-04 14:02:52 UTC
RE: CPNC
Dan Falck
2000-05-04 16:17:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: CPNC
Ron Ginger
2000-05-05 07:17:53 UTC
Re: CPNC
Ron Ginger
2000-05-07 18:23:21 UTC
Re: CPNC
Ray Henry
2000-05-08 06:30:42 UTC
Re: CPNC
Ron Ginger
2000-05-13 18:22:22 UTC
Re: CPNC