Re: Machine construction.
Posted by
builder4wd
on 2004-11-10 20:03:54 UTC
How are these 'portal' mills driven? By two screws or one? I am
planning on a similar design, but I only have one ballscrew for
the "wall" axis, so I'm wondering how robust this configuration is.
Using linear rails, will there be a problem with the axis getting
skewed under cutting loads?
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "John Heritage"
<john.heritage@v...> wrote:
planning on a similar design, but I only have one ballscrew for
the "wall" axis, so I'm wondering how robust this configuration is.
Using linear rails, will there be a problem with the axis getting
skewed under cutting loads?
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "John Heritage"
<john.heritage@v...> wrote:
> > One way to maintain accuracy using a gantry might begantry
> > to raise the table/frame sides high and securely (since you are
> > talking 12" z-axis movement, and glide the basic horizontal
> > over these so the gantry's "arms" are as short as possible.They are
>
> This is in fact the way almost all new gantry machines are built.
> often referred to as 'portal' mills, as the structure ressemblesand
> archway, which is also termed, a portal. The machine isessentially sitting
> on top of a pair of walls.But I
>
> With big machines, you can literally work around in the work area.
> thought that things might get a bit squashed if you want to scaleit down to
> a desktop sized area, as the walls would block your access to thetable
> quite a lot.accuracy of
>
> I have seen numerous portal mills specified for a positional
> 0.001mm. The design offers excellent access to the work piece forthe work
> it's self and can be built to be just as strong, if not more so,than a
> standard VMC - I have seen two manufacturers offering the designright up to
> the point of machining solid titanium.
>
> Best wishes,
> John
Discussion Thread
Robert Lyman
2004-11-09 14:11:35 UTC
Machine construction.
Bloy2004
2004-11-09 14:48:13 UTC
Re: Machine construction.
John Heritage
2004-11-09 15:41:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machine construction.
Bloy2004
2004-11-09 18:00:16 UTC
Re: Machine construction.
Robert Lyman
2004-11-09 18:50:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machine construction.
John Heritage
2004-11-10 03:22:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machine construction.
builder4wd
2004-11-10 20:03:54 UTC
Re: Machine construction.
Bloy2004
2004-11-11 04:57:11 UTC
Re: Machine construction.
John Heritage
2004-11-11 04:58:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machine construction.
Robert Lyman
2004-11-11 07:00:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machine construction.
Bloy2004
2004-11-11 07:47:24 UTC
Re: Machine construction.
John Heritage
2004-11-11 07:51:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machine construction.
David A. Frantz
2004-11-11 08:29:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Machine construction.
Tyson S.
2004-11-12 18:15:42 UTC
Click Automation Steppers
Jon Elson
2004-11-12 20:52:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Click Automation Steppers
caudlet
2004-11-13 10:24:44 UTC
Re: Click Automation Steppers