Re: Bridgeport ballscrew retrofit kits and prices
Posted by
cnc_4_me
on 2005-01-13 21:35:31 UTC
> You don't need any extra threads. You just make spacers so thatthe end
> nut holds everything.Well, that is the problem... The end nut has to hold everything...It
> >
> - Steve
has to tighten up the bearing pair thru the pulley...This means that
the pulley now cannot be pinned and probally not even
taperlocked...This leaves only setscrewing the pulley to the shaft
after the nut is tightened...For the kind of torque we are talking
about i am not sure setscrewing will hold up...
Also using the standard end does not address how to put a encoder on
the end of the ballscrew or if you want to put a handle on after the
pulley like you would like to do...This is why a custom end is so
desirable.
Wally
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Stephen Wille Padnos
<spadnos@s...> wrote:
> cnc_4_me wrote:rolled
>
> >>So what do you think is the best bet?
> >>
> >>Scott
> >>
> >>
> >Same question i have been asking myself...
> >
> >For myself there are 2 clear choices, Rockford ballscrew with
> >ballscrew with .002 or .003" error and made with customends...This
> >would give you a very nice installation...I could have one endground
> >machined for a handwheel for manual operation and the other end
> >machined for bearing support, motor drive pully and encoder...
> >
> >
> I wouldn't bother with rolled ballscrews, especially since the
> ones are so close in price. The ones I mentioned from MachineTools
> Direct are ground, and cost $600. The maximum lead error on myscrews
> was 0.000466 for the long one, and 0.000233 for the short one.(yes,
> that's just under 1/2 of a thousandth, and 1/4 of a thoudsandth)standard
>
> You don't need custom ends to use a handwheel on one side. The
> ends have a long shoulder on which a handle OR a pulley can bemounted.
> I'm trying to figure out how to get both on one end (I would likeboth X
> handles, and a Y handle), but that probably won't happen. There isa
> bearing journal on both sides, and it's needed on both sides. Youside),
> should have dual angular contact bearings on one side (the motor
> and one double-row angular contact bearing on the other side. Theends.
> single bearing on the "far" end doesn't fill the space inside the
> bearing bracket, to allow for thermal expansion without bending the
> screw. The thread on the end of the ballscrew is used on both
> I'm still designing, but I think this will be the stack-up on mymachine:
> nut | washer | spacer | pulley | spacer | bearing pair | ballscrewshoulder
> On the other side, just replace the pulley with a handwheel, andthe
> bearing pair with a single wide bearing, and you're all set.machine
> These screws are just a little long for my 9x42 table - though they
> might not be if I had official Bridgeport bearing brackets. (My
> had a power feed on X, which isn't compatible with the ballscrew,so I
> bought a clone mill bearing bracket off ebay)had
>
> The only thing I had to do was to bore out the pulleys to 0.625. I
> a hard time finding small pulleys that already had a wide bore. Idid
> find one company that can customize the pulleys, but they wanted$75
> minimum for the job - it didn't seem worth it for 4 pulleys.of
>
> >Second choise would be ground ballscrew from hiwin...For a couple
> >hundred dollars more than rolled screw you get a .0005" errorless
> >screw... And the bragging rights that go with it...But you have to
> >live with the standard ends...
> >
> >
> See above - standard ends are fine. The ground screw is still way
> accurate than the control resolution - my machine will have 40000steps
> per inch - the screw will be 20 counts of error. (though this isthe
> correctable with EMC and others)
>
> >What i would like to know is how everyone else has made do with
> >standard ballscrew ends...How did you work out the opposed bearingdo
> >mounts...You need a thread on the shaft between the pully and
> >bearings to tighten up the bearing assembly, but standard screws
> >not have this thread...They only have the end of shaft threaded tothe end
> >hold handle on...
> >
> >
> You don't need any extra threads. You just make spacers so that
> nut holds everything.
>
> >Wally
> >
> >
> - Steve
Discussion Thread
cnc_4_me
2005-01-13 13:06:35 UTC
Bridgeport ballscrew retrofit kits and prices
Polaraligned
2005-01-13 17:18:07 UTC
Re: Bridgeport ballscrew retrofit kits and prices
cnc_4_me
2005-01-13 18:41:47 UTC
Re: Bridgeport ballscrew retrofit kits and prices
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-01-13 19:55:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport ballscrew retrofit kits and prices
cnc_4_me
2005-01-13 21:35:31 UTC
Re: Bridgeport ballscrew retrofit kits and prices
C.S. Mo
2005-01-14 06:13:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport ballscrew retrofit kits and prices
R Rogers
2005-01-14 06:55:51 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport ballscrew retrofit kits and prices
Bridgeport Repair
2005-01-14 08:30:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport ballscrew retrofit kits and prices
turbulatordude
2005-01-14 08:41:07 UTC
Re: Bridgeport ballscrew retrofit kits and prices
cnc_4_me
2005-01-14 09:17:34 UTC
Re: Bridgeport ballscrew retrofit kits and prices
cnc_4_me
2005-01-14 09:32:44 UTC
Re: Bridgeport ballscrew retrofit kits and prices
cnc_4_me
2005-01-14 09:57:52 UTC
Re: Bridgeport ballscrew retrofit kits and prices
Peter Renolds
2005-01-14 18:12:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport ballscrew retrofit kits and prices