Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: NEW conversion project....
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-05-23 15:37:10 UTC
"D.F.S." wrote:
was.
It is still not good, but not as bad as I first thought.
Bridgeport,
and have wondered how heavy it was. I have had it slid over far enough
to expose the yoke that holds the leadscrew nuts. Someday, I am going
to
have to scrape that table and other parts, and need to make something
to support it so I can get it completely off.
quite
a while, and a LOT of swarf fell down into the knee. Not good for the
screws and nuts! I now have way covers, and stuff still gets down
there,
although a lot less. Since I now have ball screws, I have to be careful
about that stuff getting to the screws.
leadscrews?
That is different from Bridgeport's design, where the screws run
straight
across, from handle to handle. One handle bracket has 2 bearings for
axial constraint, the other only has one free-floating bearing.
Jon
> Here's a bit more info on the table.OK, it took me a while to figure out exactly how extensive the damage
>
> The hole goes thru the bottom of the table under the T's
>
> Ascii Example.... |T T T T|
> +=== ===+
> ^ Hole.
>
> The hole ends just inside the vertical steel for the "T" at
> the Front and back edges.
> It is just over 2 inches wide.
was.
It is still not good, but not as bad as I first thought.
> The table is probably 300 Lbs, I about busted my ass getting it inAhh, thanks for that data point. I've never had the table off my little
> the car.
Bridgeport,
and have wondered how heavy it was. I have had it slid over far enough
to expose the yoke that holds the leadscrew nuts. Someday, I am going
to
have to scrape that table and other parts, and need to make something
to support it so I can get it completely off.
> My only real reason for fixing it would be to keep the crap fromThis is pretty important. I didn't have way covers on my machine for
> falling down inside the machine, as it has for years.
quite
a while, and a LOT of swarf fell down into the knee. Not good for the
screws and nuts! I now have way covers, and stuff still gets down
there,
although a lot less. Since I now have ball screws, I have to be careful
about that stuff getting to the screws.
> I straightend the end of the leadscrew by hand to "Pretty Close"I understand this is an extension that attaches to the end of the
> I need to chuck it up in a big lathe tonight and use a dial to finish
> the process down to a few thou.
leadscrews?
That is different from Bridgeport's design, where the screws run
straight
across, from handle to handle. One handle bracket has 2 bearings for
axial constraint, the other only has one free-floating bearing.
Jon
Discussion Thread
richard_damian@p...
2000-05-23 11:07:10 UTC
Re: NEW conversion project....
D.F.S.
2000-05-23 13:37:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: NEW conversion project....
ptengin@a...
2000-05-23 13:44:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: NEW conversion project....
Jon Elson
2000-05-23 15:37:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: NEW conversion project....
stratton@m...
2000-05-23 15:42:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: NEW conversion project....
D.F.S.
2000-05-23 16:01:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: NEW conversion project....
ptengin@a...
2000-05-23 17:50:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: NEW conversion project....
D.F.S.
2000-05-24 10:28:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: NEW conversion project....
Carey L. Culpepper
2000-05-24 14:05:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: NEW conversion project....
james owens
2000-05-24 16:32:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: NEW conversion project....
Carey L. Culpepper
2000-05-24 17:11:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: NEW conversion project....
D.F.S.
2000-05-25 08:38:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: NEW conversion project....