Re: mach2 and linux - Look-Ahead
Posted by
turbulatordude
on 2005-01-29 08:18:35 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Jon Elson <elson@p...> wrote:
did what a lot of people do, get everything working with Turbo-CNC,
then had enough experiance to know what I needed and wanted.
I looked at EMC, but went to Master5 (now Mach2) for the interface.
Don't remember the specifics why, but I think it was simply because I
had a Windows machine and could try Master5 with no effort.
Up until now, I thought Mach2 was the only low cost software that
does the look ahead feature.
I cut large elipses that are comprized of multiple line segments,
about 40 per full elipise. Without the look-ahead that is nerve
wracking.
I can break the elipises into multiple arc segments for a more true
representation, but that too has limitations.
Since I'll be getting the plasma running by summer (hopefully) I'll
be able to run much faster than a router. Look-ahead will be very
important.
I have not looked at software recently am not well versed on the
features of the different products.
But, if EMC had an easy interface, I could considder testing it on
this machine.
Dave
> turbulatordude wrote:over
>
> >I would think that if the effort was put into a good interface for
> >EMC it would be faster to completion than to try to port Mach2
> >to Linux.stop
> >
> >On my wish list is a read-ahead feature so the control does not
> >at each line where a slight change of direction is encountered.G61.1 that
> >
> >
> >
> Umm, I certainly don't have this problem on EMC. If I NEED square
> corners, I do
> a G61. A G64 gets you back to smoothed trajectory. There's a
> does stop between each move. I've never used this, but have usedthe G61 to
> prevent drill breakage when drilling many holes. I don't want theXY
> axes movingdo
> until the drill is safely out of the hole.
>
> What version of EMC are you using, and on what kind of hardware? I
> LOTS ofcontinuous
> stuff with arcs and essentially spirals where it is milling a
> curve madewhole
> up of expanding arc quadrants to bore out a pocket. It does the
> thing inI'm not using EMC. When I first looked for software (2 years ago) I
> one smooth, continuous path with no stops.
>
> Jon
did what a lot of people do, get everything working with Turbo-CNC,
then had enough experiance to know what I needed and wanted.
I looked at EMC, but went to Master5 (now Mach2) for the interface.
Don't remember the specifics why, but I think it was simply because I
had a Windows machine and could try Master5 with no effort.
Up until now, I thought Mach2 was the only low cost software that
does the look ahead feature.
I cut large elipses that are comprized of multiple line segments,
about 40 per full elipise. Without the look-ahead that is nerve
wracking.
I can break the elipises into multiple arc segments for a more true
representation, but that too has limitations.
Since I'll be getting the plasma running by summer (hopefully) I'll
be able to run much faster than a router. Look-ahead will be very
important.
I have not looked at software recently am not well versed on the
features of the different products.
But, if EMC had an easy interface, I could considder testing it on
this machine.
Dave
Discussion Thread
Rod McBeath
2005-01-28 13:15:55 UTC
mach2 and linux
Codesuidae
2005-01-28 13:34:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach2 and linux
Stephen Wille Padnos
2005-01-28 15:40:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] mach2 and linux
turbulatordude
2005-01-28 17:47:35 UTC
Re: mach2 and linux
Jon Elson
2005-01-28 20:19:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: mach2 and linux
turbulatordude
2005-01-29 08:18:35 UTC
Re: mach2 and linux - Look-Ahead
Jon Elson
2005-01-29 13:21:52 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: mach2 and linux - Look-Ahead
ddfalck2002
2005-01-30 10:32:02 UTC
mach2 and linux