Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Clarification for microstepping requirement
Posted by
Richard Garnish
on 2005-12-13 05:55:33 UTC
The biggest benefit of microstepping in my view is that is greatly
reduces the resonances caused by steppers in full-step mode. This
resonance is sometimes enough to lose useful torque at certain step
frequencies, in addition to the other undesirable effects of vibration
on the machine it is attached to. Microstepping shouldn't be relied on
for greater accuracy, but it it worth it for reducing resonance and
getting more even torque response from the motor.
Richard
reduces the resonances caused by steppers in full-step mode. This
resonance is sometimes enough to lose useful torque at certain step
frequencies, in addition to the other undesirable effects of vibration
on the machine it is attached to. Microstepping shouldn't be relied on
for greater accuracy, but it it worth it for reducing resonance and
getting more even torque response from the motor.
Richard
On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 21:20, ERIC QUARNSTROM wrote:
> Hey all:
>
> I read the great FAQ's on this site regarding steppers and how they work and
> microstepping. Very inciteful and I think I even understand how they do it.
> What I can't quite figure out is why it is required. In one of the FAQ's it
> says the primary purpose for microstepping is to eliminate the jerkyness
> between steps. However, when I do the math on my proposed set up I come up
> with a movement of the axis per step that is so small I can't consider it to
> be 'jerky'. Therefore I am afraid I either didn't understand what I read
> well enough or I'm missing something. My math is below and I welcome
> comments.
>
> System statistics:
> Lead screw with 10 TPI
> 1:2 gearing between motor and lead screw
> motor with 200 steps/revolution
>
> My math:
> Every turn of the lead screw gear produces .1 inches of travel.
> Every turn of the motor gear produces .05 inches of travel
> Motor has 200 steps per turn of the motor so every one step would produce
> .05/200 inches of travel
>
> In summary .00025 inches of travel per full step seems like a very small
> amount of movement. So why would I need to divide that by 10 for a
> microstepping drive?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Eric Q.
>
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
>
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@..., timg@...
> Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@... [Moderators]
> URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
>
> OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto: aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to reach it if you have trouble.
> http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this to be a sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are there, for OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
>
> NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY POSTING THEM. DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> bill
> List Mom
> List Owner
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
Discussion Thread
CalBoy101
2005-09-07 15:01:25 UTC
Ball lead screw backlash problems
R Rogers
2005-09-07 15:53:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Ball lead screw backlash problems
jacoby01
2005-09-07 17:40:38 UTC
Re: Ball lead screw backlash problems
CalBoy101
2005-09-08 09:48:21 UTC
Re: Ball lead screw backlash problems
CalBoy101
2005-09-08 12:55:38 UTC
Re: Ball lead screw backlash problems
ERIC QUARNSTROM
2005-12-12 13:20:30 UTC
Clarification for microstepping requirement
Andy Wander
2005-12-12 13:30:01 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Clarification for microstepping requirement
Crs Hawk
2005-12-12 14:24:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Clarification for microstepping requirement
jeffalanp
2005-12-12 15:44:57 UTC
Re: Clarification for microstepping requirement
Paul Kelly
2005-12-12 17:43:52 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Clarification for microstepping requirement
ericq47
2005-12-12 17:46:28 UTC
Re: Clarification for microstepping requirement
John Dammeyer
2005-12-12 18:02:33 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Clarification for microstepping requirement
Richard Garnish
2005-12-13 05:55:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Clarification for microstepping requirement
juan gelt
2005-12-13 11:03:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Clarification for microstepping requirement
Vlad Krupin
2005-12-17 07:37:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Clarification for microstepping requirement