Re: possibly interesting
Posted by
Graham Stabler
on 2006-07-05 17:50:25 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, John Dammeyer <johnd@...> wrote:
can produce video out and put that straight into a little TFT screen,
for some of the stuff I want to do such as tool path progress, that
would be nice and would not tie my hardware to a specific display.
For me 8 processors might allow me to split tasks, one can record
pulses to the MMC card, the other can keep track of current position,
the next deal with the display. I need to read more I spend any money
though.
Graham
>magazine. What
> Hi Graham,
>
> I saw the advertisement for it in the latest Circuit Cellar
> I found disappointing though was the amount of memory available for eachtend to
> processor. Human Interface devices dealing with LCD displays etc.
> require lots of memory for either images or text. Using a processorwith
> 256K flash and 12K RAM like a 9S12 series would be more than fastenough and
> also have the large scale memory for dats structures, text messagesand even
> graphic applications. Don't really know if a 8 processor modulegains one
> anything.They seem to have a charector set built into ROM. I like the fact you
>
> John Dammeyer
>
>
can produce video out and put that straight into a little TFT screen,
for some of the stuff I want to do such as tool path progress, that
would be nice and would not tie my hardware to a specific display.
For me 8 processors might allow me to split tasks, one can record
pulses to the MMC card, the other can keep track of current position,
the next deal with the display. I need to read more I spend any money
though.
Graham
Discussion Thread
Graham Stabler
2006-07-05 16:57:01 UTC
possibly interesting
John Dammeyer
2006-07-05 17:10:11 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] possibly interesting
Phil Mattison
2006-07-05 17:36:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] possibly interesting
Graham Stabler
2006-07-05 17:50:25 UTC
Re: possibly interesting
John Dammeyer
2006-07-05 19:21:29 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: possibly interesting
Graham Stabler
2006-07-06 02:04:29 UTC
Re: possibly interesting
Graham Stabler
2006-07-25 02:01:08 UTC
Re: possibly interesting