Wood Duck
Posted by
wanliker@a...
on 2006-07-27 12:33:37 UTC
The topic "Wood Duck" is open for discussion, the machine, not the man,
unless it is favorable. There is a lot of interest in this machine, and we all
want more information.
To be included are the discussion on the machines merits, faults.
Any perceived Good and Bad features.
Any and all questions about the machine, any compliments to Ballendo.
But absolutely no FLAMING, or even close to it. (And I and the other
moderators are the judges )
The recent "Off Topic" was never aimed at the Wood Duck, it was aimed at the
replicating thread, and members starting to get into the flaming mode.
Discussion on that thread strictly to CCED owners, moderators, or myself.
addresses below the signature line. Nothing back to the group, argue with me
in person.
Fire away, but No Flames or you are the one to get banned.
bill
List Mom.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
unless it is favorable. There is a lot of interest in this machine, and we all
want more information.
To be included are the discussion on the machines merits, faults.
Any perceived Good and Bad features.
Any and all questions about the machine, any compliments to Ballendo.
But absolutely no FLAMING, or even close to it. (And I and the other
moderators are the judges )
The recent "Off Topic" was never aimed at the Wood Duck, it was aimed at the
replicating thread, and members starting to get into the flaming mode.
Discussion on that thread strictly to CCED owners, moderators, or myself.
addresses below the signature line. Nothing back to the group, argue with me
in person.
Fire away, but No Flames or you are the one to get banned.
bill
List Mom.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
wanliker@a...
2006-07-27 12:33:37 UTC
Wood Duck
Dennis Schmitz
2006-07-27 13:43:03 UTC
Re: Wood Duck
Vince Negrete
2006-07-27 13:53:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Wood Duck
Alan Marconett
2006-07-27 14:42:17 UTC
RE: Rapid Prototyping, was: Wood Duck
Philip Burman
2006-07-27 14:52:27 UTC
Re: Wood Duck
Tony Jeffree
2006-07-27 15:45:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Wood Duck
wotisname
2006-07-27 16:46:21 UTC
Re: Wood Duck
Graham Stabler
2006-07-27 16:54:16 UTC
Re: Wood Duck
wanliker@a...
2006-07-27 17:09:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Wood Duck
Dan Mauch
2006-07-27 17:13:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Wood Duck
wanliker@a...
2006-07-27 17:27:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Wood Duck
Phil Mattison
2006-07-27 18:25:47 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Wood Duck
caudlet
2006-07-27 18:29:55 UTC
Re: Wood Duck (and being a moderator)
wanliker@a...
2006-07-27 18:35:02 UTC
Wood Duck (and being a moderator)
turbulatordude
2006-07-27 18:35:12 UTC
Whoops is OFF-TOPIC
wanliker@a...
2006-07-27 18:45:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Whoops is OFF-TOPIC
wanliker@a...
2006-07-27 18:50:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Whoops is OFF-TOPIC
Dan Mauch
2006-07-28 07:33:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Wood Duck
ballendo
2006-07-29 11:16:57 UTC
Re: Wood Duck (post test?)
turbulatordude
2006-07-29 12:00:09 UTC
Re: Wood Duck - Home page pictures ???