Re: Wood Duck
Posted by
Philip Burman
on 2006-07-27 14:52:27 UTC
Surely you mean "the box" not "the machine".
What has a photograph of a pair of cardboard boxes got to do with
DIY CNC machines, other than to poke fun at a member who cannot
reply without the risk of being censored. Members having a go at
each other is kinda fair game, it happens, we live with it. But when
a moderator chooses to ridicule a member then that's abuse of
position, and we all know where that leads.
I insist that you remove the current photo and replace it with
something less insulting. A pubic apology is not an unreasonable way
forward either.
I'm sure I won't be missed but I am about ready to unsubscribe.
Regards
Phil
What has a photograph of a pair of cardboard boxes got to do with
DIY CNC machines, other than to poke fun at a member who cannot
reply without the risk of being censored. Members having a go at
each other is kinda fair game, it happens, we live with it. But when
a moderator chooses to ridicule a member then that's abuse of
position, and we all know where that leads.
I insist that you remove the current photo and replace it with
something less insulting. A pubic apology is not an unreasonable way
forward either.
I'm sure I won't be missed but I am about ready to unsubscribe.
Regards
Phil
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@... wrote:
>
> The topic "Wood Duck" is open for discussion, the machine, not the
man,
> unless it is favorable. There is a lot of interest in this
machine, and we all
> want more information.
>
> To be included are the discussion on the machines merits,
faults.
>
> Any perceived Good and Bad features.
> Any and all questions about the machine, any compliments to
Ballendo.
>
> But absolutely no FLAMING, or even close to it. (And I and the
other
> moderators are the judges )
>
>
> The recent "Off Topic" was never aimed at the Wood Duck, it was
aimed at the
> replicating thread, and members starting to get into the flaming
mode.
> Discussion on that thread strictly to CCED owners, moderators, or
myself.
> addresses below the signature line. Nothing back to the group,
argue with me
> in person.
>
>
> Fire away, but No Flames or you are the one to get banned.
>
>
> bill
> List Mom.
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
Discussion Thread
wanliker@a...
2006-07-27 12:33:37 UTC
Wood Duck
Dennis Schmitz
2006-07-27 13:43:03 UTC
Re: Wood Duck
Vince Negrete
2006-07-27 13:53:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Wood Duck
Alan Marconett
2006-07-27 14:42:17 UTC
RE: Rapid Prototyping, was: Wood Duck
Philip Burman
2006-07-27 14:52:27 UTC
Re: Wood Duck
Tony Jeffree
2006-07-27 15:45:58 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Wood Duck
wotisname
2006-07-27 16:46:21 UTC
Re: Wood Duck
Graham Stabler
2006-07-27 16:54:16 UTC
Re: Wood Duck
wanliker@a...
2006-07-27 17:09:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Wood Duck
Dan Mauch
2006-07-27 17:13:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Wood Duck
wanliker@a...
2006-07-27 17:27:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Wood Duck
Phil Mattison
2006-07-27 18:25:47 UTC
[CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Wood Duck
caudlet
2006-07-27 18:29:55 UTC
Re: Wood Duck (and being a moderator)
wanliker@a...
2006-07-27 18:35:02 UTC
Wood Duck (and being a moderator)
turbulatordude
2006-07-27 18:35:12 UTC
Whoops is OFF-TOPIC
wanliker@a...
2006-07-27 18:45:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Whoops is OFF-TOPIC
wanliker@a...
2006-07-27 18:50:36 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Whoops is OFF-TOPIC
Dan Mauch
2006-07-28 07:33:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Wood Duck
ballendo
2006-07-29 11:16:57 UTC
Re: Wood Duck (post test?)
turbulatordude
2006-07-29 12:00:09 UTC
Re: Wood Duck - Home page pictures ???