Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Camera Software
Posted by
Stephen Wille Padnos
on 2006-08-01 07:57:13 UTC
Graham Stabler wrote:
have interpreted it the same way I did.
- Steve
>--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, Stephen Wille PadnosAh - my misunderstanding. At least it's cleared up for others who may
><spadnos@...> wrote:
>
>
>>I'm pretty sure this won't work. You'll end up with a big smear >
>>
>>
>instead of a picture.
>
>I wasn't saying no optics were needed but they don't have to be the
>cameras origional optics.
>
>Graham
>
>
have interpreted it the same way I did.
- Steve
Discussion Thread
Neil Gillies
2006-08-01 01:08:29 UTC
Re: Camera Software
Graham Stabler
2006-08-01 02:59:20 UTC
Re: Camera Software
Stephen Wille Padnos
2006-08-01 06:31:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Camera Software
jesse Brennan
2006-08-01 06:40:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Camera Software
Graham Stabler
2006-08-01 07:50:23 UTC
Re: Camera Software
Stephen Wille Padnos
2006-08-01 07:57:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Camera Software
Graham Stabler
2006-08-01 07:59:39 UTC
Re: Camera Software
ED MAISEY
2006-08-01 14:00:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Camera Software
Sebastien Bailard - Dubsen
2006-08-02 00:10:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Camera Software
Dennis Schmitz
2006-08-02 13:02:40 UTC
Re: Camera Software