CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor

Posted by Dave Pope
on 2006-08-16 09:01:15 UTC
Jon,
Like Peter, I thought that comment was a bit below the belt.
I have both Rutex and Gecko servo drives and can not speak highly enough about either brand.
Both are excellent.
I'm only using the cheapest US Digital 2 channel encoders, connected by standard network cables
(1 is about30feet long) and seems fine to me. Tuning by software is a bit of a challenge at my age,
but the info is all out there if you look.It also eliminates that old bogy of someone's "sexy fingers" syndrome, once they are set up.
I think both Marris and Vlad serve us well with bloody good products and we are all very lucky to have them.
So there!!
Regards,
Dave Pope.
Perth.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jon Elson
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Sent: 16 August, 2006 12:38 PM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor


Peter Homann wrote:

>Jon,
>
>That's just plain rude and offensive!
>
>The advantages of using differential signals are very clear. It's the
>reason why it's standard practice in a lot of the industrial control
>industry.
>
>
>
>
I agree that differential signals help reduce noise. Many lower-cost
CNC systems,
especially home shop-level, don't use them due to cost. All the lower-cost
encoders and servo motors with built in/on encoders, such as HP, US digital,
etc. are single-ended.

>Note to moderators: I didn't think this short of "Bashing" was allowed on
>this group.
>
>
>
If they really need differential signals for anything over one foot,
they must have
an electrical noise problem. As I say, I have worked with a number of
CNC systems
that have up to 30 feet of encoder cables, and they work fine without
differential
drivers.

I can see some reason for Rutex to recommend this just to cut down on
support
calls. Certainly, when Joe Metalworker tries to hook up a Rutex drive
to a plasma
table with 30+ feet of unshielded single-ended encoder cables, he's
going to have
a problem.

Jon





------------------------------------------------------------------------------


No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.10.10/419 - Release Date: 15-Aug-06

----------

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.10.10/419 - Release Date: 15-Aug-06


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Discussion Thread

shadi_salhab_78 2006-08-14 11:59:13 UTC Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor Wayne Weedon 2006-08-14 13:43:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor leotata 2006-08-15 09:35:15 UTC Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor afogassa 2006-08-15 16:41:01 UTC Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor Jon Elson 2006-08-15 18:30:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor caudlet 2006-08-15 19:14:13 UTC Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor Peter Homann 2006-08-15 21:01:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor Jon Elson 2006-08-15 21:34:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor Mariss Freimanis 2006-08-15 21:54:40 UTC Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor Les Newell 2006-08-16 01:07:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor Steve Stallings 2006-08-16 05:27:26 UTC Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor Dave Pope 2006-08-16 09:01:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor Jon Elson 2006-08-16 09:53:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor Dennis Schmitz 2006-08-16 11:13:40 UTC Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor afogassa 2006-08-16 14:36:15 UTC Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor Jon Elson 2006-08-16 19:27:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor