CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor

on 2006-08-15 21:54:40 UTC
It makes a lot of sense to use differential drivers/recievers if MHz
or more signals must be sent.

These signals cannot be effectively low-pass filtered to remove noise
because often the signal period is less than the noise pulse.
Filtering would then remove the signal as well as the noise.

Low and moderate cost optical encoders use photo-transistors. Photo-
transistor frequency respose begins to roll-off above 50kHz at best.
This makes the minimum usable encoder logic 0/1 time 10uS.

Noise is generally pulses narrower than 1uS, so low-pass filtering is
very effective in removing the noise while preserving the signal.

To it makes absolutely no sense to use differential encoders for
reasons of noise reduction. Answer for yourself this question: Why do
drives that use differential encoders also not use differential step
and direction inputs?

Step pulses can have pulse widths at or under 1uS. These pulses
cannot be low-pass filtered for the reasons mentioned. If differental
inputs are used anywhere, they should be used first on the
step/direction interface.

I'd love to hear the reasoning for that.

Mariss



--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "Peter Homann" <groups@...>
wrote:
>
> Jon,
>
> That's just plain rude and offensive!
>
> The advantages of using differential signals are very clear. It's
the
> reason why it's standard practice in a lot of the industrial control
> industry.
>
>
>
> Note to moderators: I didn't think this short of "Bashing" was
allowed on
> this group.
>
>
>
> Jon Elson wrote:
> > afogassa wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Rutex new drives needs differential encoders if the distance from
> >>pcb to the motor is over 1 foot or so, rutex has a pcb that
> >>converters the signal from incremental encoders to differential
it's
> >>about 20Us$ or so.
> >> After installing the converter don't use pullup resistors.
> >>I'm using rutex drives and it's very good, little hard to tune it
> >>with software, I like the old ones with pots to set it up.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > Oh, wonderful! They must be doing something really "SPECIAL" in
their
> > drives
> > to require this. I have several installations with 30 FEET of
encoder
> > cable that
> > work perfectly with single-ended encoders. So, I'm glad I don't
use
> > Rutex drives.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> >
> > Addresses:
> > FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> > FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
> > Post Messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> >
> > Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> > List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...,
> > timg@...
> > Moderator: pentam@... indigo_red@... davemucha@...
> > [Moderators]
> > URL to this group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> >
> > OFF Topic POSTS: General Machining
> > If you wish to post on unlimited OT subjects goto:
> > aol://5863:126/rec.crafts.metalworking or go thru Google.com to
reach it
> > if you have trouble.
> > http://www.metalworking.com/news_servers.html
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jobshophomeshop I consider this
to be a
> > sister site to the CCED group, as many of the same members are
there, for
> > OT subjects, that are not allowed on the CCED list.
> >
> > NOTICE: ALL POSTINGS TO THIS GROUP BECOME PUBLIC DOMAIN BY
POSTING THEM.
> > DON'T POST IF YOU CAN NOT ACCEPT THIS.....NO EXCEPTIONS........
> > bill
> > List Mom
> > List Owner
> >
> >
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Discussion Thread

shadi_salhab_78 2006-08-14 11:59:13 UTC Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor Wayne Weedon 2006-08-14 13:43:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor leotata 2006-08-15 09:35:15 UTC Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor afogassa 2006-08-15 16:41:01 UTC Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor Jon Elson 2006-08-15 18:30:18 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor caudlet 2006-08-15 19:14:13 UTC Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor Peter Homann 2006-08-15 21:01:54 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor Jon Elson 2006-08-15 21:34:31 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor Mariss Freimanis 2006-08-15 21:54:40 UTC Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor Les Newell 2006-08-16 01:07:36 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor Steve Stallings 2006-08-16 05:27:26 UTC Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor Dave Pope 2006-08-16 09:01:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor Jon Elson 2006-08-16 09:53:45 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor Dennis Schmitz 2006-08-16 11:13:40 UTC Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor afogassa 2006-08-16 14:36:15 UTC Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor Jon Elson 2006-08-16 19:27:12 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Agilent Encoder Pull-up resistor