Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] hydrapath 3 data transmission ???
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2007-02-10 11:31:18 UTC
R Rogers wrote:
character code to
the control. If it doesn't see that character, it ignores everything.
It is often the "%"
character that is used for this purpose. One of the reasons for this is
so that the
part number or description could be punched in human-readable form of
holes in
the begnning of the tape.
Jon
>Hi Jon,OK, then, you need to send a particular character that identifies the
>
> It takes either or. After reading the replies, sounds like a rather involved task.
>
>
> Jon Elson <elson@...> wrote:
> rogersmach wrote:
>
>
>
>>
>>
>Are you sure it takes ASCII? Some of the really old controls only accepted
>EIA code, or could be ordered with one or the other, not both. If it had a
>6-channel paper tape reader, that infers EIA code only.
>
>
>
character code to
the control. If it doesn't see that character, it ignores everything.
It is often the "%"
character that is used for this purpose. One of the reasons for this is
so that the
part number or description could be punched in human-readable form of
holes in
the begnning of the tape.
Jon
Discussion Thread
rogersmach
2007-02-09 14:34:51 UTC
hydrapath 3 data transmission ???
David Speck
2007-02-09 15:29:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] hydrapath 3 data transmission ???
caudlet
2007-02-09 16:26:08 UTC
Re: hydrapath 3 data transmission ???
R Rogers
2007-02-09 18:30:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: hydrapath 3 data transmission ???
Jon Elson
2007-02-09 20:32:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] hydrapath 3 data transmission ???
R Rogers
2007-02-10 05:22:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] hydrapath 3 data transmission ???
Jon Elson
2007-02-10 11:31:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] hydrapath 3 data transmission ???
R Rogers
2007-02-10 12:24:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] hydrapath 3 data transmission ???