Re: Re: Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
Posted by
John Stevenson
on 2007-03-25 03:38:53 UTC
> John, Exactly. I went over and checked it out, it does look improved a greatWell I took the time to watch the video last night and although it's limited it's well worth watching to make your own mind up.
> deal. Haven't watched the video yet.
>
> They always come out with a high price, after the market shock wears off and
> they've sold it to everyone they can think of, then the CD's are just more tea
> saucers for them :) Thats always been there philosophy it seems, bleed every
> penny out and the price keeps dropping, especially after a newer version comes
> out.
>
> If they are listing 1495 right now on the site for 2D, that means it can be
> bought for, well you know how much :)
>
Bobcad V20 / 21 it definitely isn't.
In 20 / 21 you selected tool path from the cad screen and entered tool details, speeds feeds atc and 20 / 21 then wrote that section of the code.
In 22 or to give it the correct name 2007, you work off an operation tree at the side, all selections, tools which are linked to speeds feeds etc, lead in's out etc and done from this list.
Then when all operations are done the ost is run and the code generated.
Any alterations are done from the operations tree and reposted, no editing of code needed.
Now what the code looks like is anyones guess at this point. No simulation is shown in the short video.
They have made a move in the right direction and I'd like to see a demo version.
John S.
Discussion Thread
John Stevenson
2007-03-25 03:38:53 UTC
Re: Re: Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
John Stevenson
2007-03-25 05:38:48 UTC
Re: Re: Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
Rodney Hill
2007-03-25 06:04:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
mikehenryil
2007-03-25 07:33:57 UTC
Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam