Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
Posted by
mikehenryil
on 2007-03-25 07:33:57 UTC
I watched the video and it looked interesting enough to maybe warrant
spending time on a demo. I'd want to see what sort of part file
formats can be imported and would want want simulation included
before plunking down any money for a retail version.
BobCAD's reputation is also a concern, for me at least.
Mike
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "John Stevenson" <john@...>
wrote:
these are add ons.
2-1/2D with a bit of 3D thrown in as a bonus.
new version 2007 can cut the mustard there is a market out there for
it.
brings in more money than 2 sales at $3,000
you will never satisfy these so take them out the equasion.
the upgrade path will good content it sells itself by word of users
and overall sales are up.
they have leeway to move as some have stated they bought far less
than quoted.
<g> so you know only too well there mistakes
base version. I don't regard the current v21 or Vector as good 3D
packages.
spending time on a demo. I'd want to see what sort of part file
formats can be imported and would want want simulation included
before plunking down any money for a retail version.
BobCAD's reputation is also a concern, for me at least.
Mike
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com, "John Stevenson" <john@...>
wrote:
>now. They have no
>
> > But the main difference is guys, its all 3rd party developing
> > choice but to sell it for much more. Just remember what i'mtelling you everyone
> > and you'll be suprised. The days of BobCAD wheelin and dealin,over!!
>mean to tell me they don't have some leeway built in ?
> OK but we will wait and see.
> So far they have only quoted one price for one module but you don't
> As regards 3rd pary it maybe, you seem to know more.are availabale and I dare say these will cost but as far as I can see
> I do know from their advertising that some of the Predator modules
these are add ons.
>fantastic program for the price, easy to learn as well but it's only
> Now don't get me wrong I'm a big Dolphin fan and think that it's a
2-1/2D with a bit of 3D thrown in as a bonus.
> Their 3D package is a rebadged version of Sprutcam, not exactlycheap for a beginner and certainly not easy to learn.
>perform. Bobcad has been able to do this but not easily and if their
> So there is room out there for a 'cheap' 3D package that can
new version 2007 can cut the mustard there is a market out there for
it.
> It's all a quaestion of what the market will stand and if someoneis wise enough to do the maths and work out that ten sales at $999
brings in more money than 2 sales at $3,000
>there, OK so there are some tight arses for who $10 is too much but
> Home CNC is getting more popular by the month so users are out
you will never satisfy these so take them out the equasion.
> Look at TurboCAD as a market model, cheap and nasty to start withbut cheap upgrades to better programs and if you can keep users on
the upgrade path will good content it sells itself by word of users
and overall sales are up.
>about it in that they won't publish a price but evn from what we read
> OneCNC is in this same position today but they are less profile
they have leeway to move as some have stated they bought far less
than quoted.
>other post you admit you were one of the spammers employed by them
> It's early days and they do have a lot to catch up on, by your
<g> so you know only too well there mistakes
> but IF they have the product they also have the means to get thesoftware and it's satisfied customers to sell itself.
>$1500 mark and be available for home shop use even if it's only a
> I for one would like to see a good 3D package break the $1,000 -
base version. I don't regard the current v21 or Vector as good 3D
packages.
> By doing this sales will be guaranteed and word of mouth and online support and user forums will expand the customer base.
><snip>
> Has anyone else watched the video ? if so opinions please.
>
> John S.
>
Discussion Thread
John Stevenson
2007-03-25 03:38:53 UTC
Re: Re: Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
John Stevenson
2007-03-25 05:38:48 UTC
Re: Re: Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
Rodney Hill
2007-03-25 06:04:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam
mikehenryil
2007-03-25 07:33:57 UTC
Re: BobCadCam versus VectorCadCam