Re: Backlash
Posted by
Vince Endter
on 2007-03-25 08:12:57 UTC
The backlash is the same regardless of where in the travel the
ballscrew/nut is. For the backlash to be caused by flexing, the
ballscrew would have to deflect .215". I can garentee that the
ballscrew is not flexing that much. As for twisting, the pully in the
video rotates almost 4 degrees before the table starts to move. The
table takes about 40 pounds of pressure to get it moving and about 5
pounds to keep it moving. Hiwin said their ballscrew have a working
range well over 400 pounds.
Vince
ballscrew/nut is. For the backlash to be caused by flexing, the
ballscrew would have to deflect .215". I can garentee that the
ballscrew is not flexing that much. As for twisting, the pully in the
video rotates almost 4 degrees before the table starts to move. The
table takes about 40 pounds of pressure to get it moving and about 5
pounds to keep it moving. Hiwin said their ballscrew have a working
range well over 400 pounds.
Vince
>
> If you do the test with the screw fully extended and fully retracted
> can you not differentiate between flexing/twisting of the screw and
> flexing of the yoke. Maybe even extrapilate the error back to an
> effectively zero length screw to filter out ther screw error.
>
> Regards
> Phil
Discussion Thread
Blue
2005-02-09 10:10:31 UTC
Backlash
Jon Elson
2005-02-09 11:14:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Backlash
Blue
2005-02-09 12:06:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Backlash
Vince Endter
2007-03-24 09:47:12 UTC
Backlash
Mark Vaughan
2007-03-24 11:25:34 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Backlash
R Rogers
2007-03-24 12:17:48 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Backlash
Polaraligned
2007-03-24 13:05:11 UTC
Re: Backlash
Vince Endter
2007-03-24 15:04:08 UTC
Re: Backlash
Vince Endter
2007-03-24 15:08:56 UTC
Re: Backlash
Mark Vaughan
2007-03-24 15:26:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Backlash
Polaraligned
2007-03-24 17:19:09 UTC
Re: Backlash
Jon Elson
2007-03-24 21:38:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Backlash
Vince Endter
2007-03-24 21:45:39 UTC
Re: Backlash
ballendo
2007-03-25 00:02:24 UTC
Re: Backlash
ballendo
2007-03-25 00:06:36 UTC
Re: Backlash
Philip Burman
2007-03-25 04:22:31 UTC
Re: Backlash
Vince Endter
2007-03-25 08:12:57 UTC
Re: Backlash
Graham Stabler
2007-03-25 08:24:01 UTC
Re: Backlash
Mark Vaughan
2007-03-25 09:33:29 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Backlash
Vince Endter
2007-03-25 11:24:43 UTC
Re: Backlash
Jon Elson
2007-03-25 11:33:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Backlash
R Rogers
2007-03-25 12:31:13 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Backlash
David G. LeVine
2007-03-25 13:07:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Backlash
Mark Vaughan
2007-03-25 13:46:33 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Backlash
Mark Vaughan
2007-03-25 14:14:22 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Backlash
Vince Endter
2007-03-25 20:17:54 UTC
Re: Backlash
Vince Endter
2007-03-25 20:19:24 UTC
Re: Backlash
Vince Endter
2007-03-25 20:22:07 UTC
Re: Backlash
David G. LeVine
2007-03-25 21:24:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Backlash
R Rogers
2007-03-25 21:37:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Backlash
Jon Elson
2007-03-25 21:58:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Backlash
Jon Elson
2007-03-25 22:04:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Backlash
Vince Endter
2007-03-26 05:09:28 UTC
Re: Backlash
Jon Elson
2007-03-26 20:57:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Backlash
Jack Mc Kie
2008-01-13 17:39:51 UTC
Backlash
figNoggle
2008-01-13 18:36:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Backlash
Jack McKie
2008-01-16 13:10:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Backlash