Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM GENERATORS
Posted by
David G. LeVine
on 2007-08-07 10:36:22 UTC
At 12:20 PM 8/7/2007, you wrote:
0.6 Volts) after a short delay (to allow the channel to decay) should
either result in zero volts (short) or 0.6 Volts (depending on the
voltage limit.) The circuitry is pretty simple, but the devil is in
the details -- protecting the comparator from the HV spikes.
David G. LeVine
Nashua, NH 03060
>it does seem that one should have a test for short before each pulse,Putting a small voltage limited current into the work (e.g. 1 mA and
>if that can be added to the circuit.
0.6 Volts) after a short delay (to allow the channel to decay) should
either result in zero volts (short) or 0.6 Volts (depending on the
voltage limit.) The circuitry is pretty simple, but the devil is in
the details -- protecting the comparator from the HV spikes.
David G. LeVine
Nashua, NH 03060
Discussion Thread
john_glynn57
2007-08-06 04:52:56 UTC
EDM GENERATORS
Jon Elson
2007-08-06 07:14:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM GENERATORS
Dan Mauch
2007-08-06 07:31:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM GENERATORS
Marcus
2007-08-06 10:59:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] EDM GENERATORS
turbulatordude
2007-08-07 09:21:40 UTC
Re: EDM GENERATORS
Jon Elson
2007-08-07 09:44:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM GENERATORS
David G. LeVine
2007-08-07 10:36:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM GENERATORS
Jon Elson
2007-08-07 18:07:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: EDM GENERATORS
Graham Stabler
2007-08-08 00:52:59 UTC
Re: EDM GENERATORS
Graham Stabler
2007-08-08 01:00:22 UTC
Re: EDM GENERATORS