Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: A Modest Proposal!
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2012-03-06 09:47:44 UTC
KalleP wrote:
timing of step
pulses, a servo might need to be updated only every millisecond. Of
course, the
servo needs some external hardware to create the velocity command to the
drive.
Jon
> However servo motor feedback loops may be something to consider in terms of CPU resources and RTOS latency.Actually, servos are easier to control. While steppers need microsecond
timing of step
pulses, a servo might need to be updated only every millisecond. Of
course, the
servo needs some external hardware to create the velocity command to the
drive.
Jon
Discussion Thread
cnc_joker
2012-03-02 12:06:05 UTC
A Modest Proposal!
Jon Elson
2012-03-02 19:11:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] A Modest Proposal!
Vince Negrete
2012-03-02 19:36:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] A Modest Proposal!
Charles Anderson
2012-03-02 20:45:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] A Modest Proposal!
Jon Elson
2012-03-03 12:41:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] A Modest Proposal!
Tony Smith
2012-03-03 19:30:58 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] A Modest Proposal!
Jon Elson
2012-03-03 20:00:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] A Modest Proposal!
Tony Smith
2012-03-04 03:02:59 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] A Modest Proposal!
Jon Elson
2012-03-04 11:10:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] A Modest Proposal!
KalleP
2012-03-06 08:50:45 UTC
Re: A Modest Proposal!
Jon Elson
2012-03-06 09:47:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: A Modest Proposal!
KalleP
2012-03-08 07:50:11 UTC
Re: A Modest Proposal!
Jon Elson
2012-03-08 09:27:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: A Modest Proposal!