RE:Cad programs
Posted by
Fred Smith
on 2000-09-21 07:36:22 UTC
>Message: 9Bob- I have used Rhino & was very active in the early beta releases. When I was evaluating software to recommend with Vector and StlWork, I wanted certain characteristics. Of all the programs that I evaluated Rhino and Amapi were the 2 that best fit my needs. Both were very useful tools, Amapi was 1/2 the retail price of Rhino & actually had some features that Rhino didn't seem to support at the time (internet model distribution, EZ wireframe to solid model, smoothing). Both support Microscribe, have excellent web sites, networks of users, and on-line tutorials, etc.
> Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 20:50:00 -0500
> From: "Bob Campbell" <bob@...>
>Subject: Re: RE:Cad programs
>You never seem to mention Rhino 3D. How does Amapi compare to Rhino? Rhino
>3D for $795 is a great price for a 3d modeling program.
>
I have 3 problems with Rhino
1) McNeal and assoc are a very large Autocad dealer/VAR, They won't compete with Autocad, and even worse they made the Rhino interface similar to Autocad. This arrangement leaves a bad taste in my mouth, because I dislike the Autocad interface.
2) Rhino does a lot of things that I want to do. However it also does a LOT of things that I will never want to do & wish they would not have cluttered up the program with. Amapi fits my personal needs a lot better.
3) I am not personally comfortable with Rhino. My usage of a solid modeler is intermittent, just like my usage of a Cad-Cam program. I put it down & come back 2 weeks later to continue a project that has been in the works for 6 months. With Rhino I have to relearn the darned program every time. Just like Autocad, it does not work the way I think. Maybe that's my handicap, maybe I'm just spoiled by Vector. At any rate I have spent probably 150-200 hours with Rhino and 1/2 that with Amapi. My grasp of Amapi is such that I can actually make models that are usable. My Rhino retention is zip.
Rhino has excellent bidirectional IGES translators. It is worth it to buy Rhino just for access to these.
Last thing about why I did not go with Rhino. The people at TGS, the company that distributes Amapi, are extremely workable. They are more oriented to the retail/personal/home market, than the commercial/industrial buyers. They have gone out of their way to accommodate our requirements for bundling Amapi with StlWork, the number one criteria for that, after functionality and fitness, being price.
> From: dougrasmussen@...I have not used 3D-Studio. It is a high end program with many well heeled users. It is known for having produced some of the better animations and special effects in the movie industry. Both Amapi & StlTrans can import and process files made with 3D-Studio.
>Subject: Re: RE:Cad programs
>Are you familiar with a program called 3D-Studio (or was it 3D-
>Designer?) I have a customer who is a well known artist specializing
>in large scale outdoor public art. He uses 3D-"whatever" in his
>design and presentations. His computer guy gave me a demonstration
>which I thought was impressive. Probably fairly expensive?
>
>Also, have you ever looked at VisualCad which now owned by IMSI?I have not. The problem for me, with Visual Cad is that it does not receive very much ongoing development and enhancement. Also IMSI(who also sells Turbocad) is just barely dragging itself out of bankruptcy. I don't think they offer a lot product support for Visual Cad, especially when it is a competitor to Turbocad.
>I've found it easy to use.
Best Regards, Fred Smith- IMService
Listserve Special discounts and offers are at: http://209.69.202.197/cadcamedmdro.html
imserv@... Voice:248-486-3600 or 800-386-1670 Fax: 248-486-3698
Discussion Thread
Dan Dowell
2000-09-19 23:11:43 UTC
Cad programs
Phil Laliberte
2000-09-19 23:51:22 UTC
Re: Cad programs
ballendo@y...
2000-09-20 00:01:43 UTC
RE:Cad programs
Dan Dowell
2000-09-20 08:36:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE:Cad programs
Dan Dowell
2000-09-20 08:44:16 UTC
Cad programs
andy@o...
2000-09-20 10:36:39 UTC
Re: Cad programs
William Scalione
2000-09-20 10:59:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cad programs
Doug Harrison
2000-09-20 13:23:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cad programs
Dan Dowell
2000-09-20 15:33:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Cad programs
Fred Smith
2000-09-20 18:31:31 UTC
RE:Cad programs
Bob Campbell
2000-09-20 18:42:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE:Cad programs
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2000-09-20 18:45:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE:Cad programs
dougrasmussen@c...
2000-09-20 20:41:39 UTC
Re: RE:Cad programs
Dan Dowell
2000-09-20 21:10:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE:Cad programs
Tim Goldstein
2000-09-20 21:20:18 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE:Cad programs
Fred Smith
2000-09-21 07:36:22 UTC
RE:Cad programs
Andrew Werby
2000-09-21 10:38:50 UTC
RE:Cad programs
Bob Campbell
2000-09-21 11:31:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE:Cad programs