Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Response - The Saga
Posted by
Ron Ginger
on 2000-10-12 12:29:42 UTC
Art Fenerty wrote:
reasons for such 'crippled versions' of software, and dont want to open
any flame wars here on if thats good or bad- its a fact, OK.
BUT, to silently start missing moves could be dangerous, and certailny
would make me mad as hell if it happened while I was testing software.
cncpro has a somewhat random time out, but it stops working completely
and flashes up a message box. I found that annoying, since in my first
tests I issued a lot of commands while trying just to get the setup
parameters correct, but at least there was no doubt when it reached the
limit. I got past it enough to decide it was a good package and bought
it.
I would really encourage you to make the end obvious, not silent. If I
had hit such a timeout on an evaluation package I would refuse to buy it
no matter how good it was otherwise.
ron
>I think this silent change is a VERY BAD thing. I understand all the
> Ballendo:
>
> Unregistered only, of course. The registered version works forever. The
> program will actually start to jump lines of g-code after an hour or so. I
> should have a message box open up to tell the user his time just expired.
> ( hmmm, next version).
reasons for such 'crippled versions' of software, and dont want to open
any flame wars here on if thats good or bad- its a fact, OK.
BUT, to silently start missing moves could be dangerous, and certailny
would make me mad as hell if it happened while I was testing software.
cncpro has a somewhat random time out, but it stops working completely
and flashes up a message box. I found that annoying, since in my first
tests I issued a lot of commands while trying just to get the setup
parameters correct, but at least there was no doubt when it reached the
limit. I got past it enough to decide it was a good package and bought
it.
I would really encourage you to make the end obvious, not silent. If I
had hit such a timeout on an evaluation package I would refuse to buy it
no matter how good it was otherwise.
ron
Discussion Thread
Joe Vicars
2000-10-10 10:26:20 UTC
Response - The Saga
Anne Ogborn
2000-10-10 12:39:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Response - The Saga
ballendo@y...
2000-10-10 18:32:23 UTC
Response - The Saga
Art Fenerty
2000-10-11 13:06:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Response - The Saga
ballendo@y...
2000-10-11 22:47:38 UTC
Re: Response - The Saga
Art Fenerty
2000-10-12 11:28:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Response - The Saga
Ron Ginger
2000-10-12 12:29:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Response - The Saga
ballendo@y...
2000-10-12 15:48:04 UTC
Re: Re: Response - The Saga
Matt Shaver
2000-10-12 20:15:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Response - The Saga
Art Fenerty
2000-10-13 12:01:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Response - The Saga