Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Holtzapffel
Posted by
Jon Anderson
on 2000-10-18 12:25:20 UTC
Wayde C Gutman wrote:
I had the article saved somewhere, but have not been able to find it for
some time.
It was as nice looking a machine as anyone is making anywhere today.
Everything out in the open, nicely anodized aluminum, shiny SS parts,
enough to really get the tool-drool glands going....
Don't recall the name of the company either. Perhaps PopSci or PopMech
has an online searchable arhive.
Jon
> Now I wished I had kept that article....That was in either Popular Science or Popular Mechanics.
I had the article saved somewhere, but have not been able to find it for
some time.
It was as nice looking a machine as anyone is making anywhere today.
Everything out in the open, nicely anodized aluminum, shiny SS parts,
enough to really get the tool-drool glands going....
Don't recall the name of the company either. Perhaps PopSci or PopMech
has an online searchable arhive.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Ken Jenkins
2000-10-17 07:43:25 UTC
Re: Holtzapffel
Wayde C Gutman
2000-10-18 11:27:15 UTC
Re: Holtzapffel
Ron Ginger
2000-10-18 12:09:00 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Holtzapffel
Jon Anderson
2000-10-18 12:25:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Holtzapffel
machines@n...
2000-10-18 13:45:41 UTC
Re: Holtzapffel
Joe Vicars
2000-10-18 14:28:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Holtzapffel
Jon Anderson
2000-10-18 14:29:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Holtzapffel
John Stevenson
2000-10-18 15:04:54 UTC
Re: Holtzapffel
wanliker@a...
2000-10-18 15:36:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Holtzapffel
dougrasmussen@c...
2000-10-18 18:10:21 UTC
Holtzapffel setup is tedious...