Re: Bridgeport quick change tooling
Posted by
Wally K
on 2000-10-29 20:54:20 UTC
Thanks for the info Jon. Your story about not selling the pull studs
fills in the picture for me, i was wondering if those studs screwed
in or if they were intergal to the holder. I downloaded the 34 page
manual at the Acu-Rite web site, was supprised at the amount of work
it took to install. Learned a lot from reading it. Also looked at
the other systems mentioned by others in this forum like snap. These
products are greatly overpriced. I am now thinking of making my own
system.
Wally K.
fills in the picture for me, i was wondering if those studs screwed
in or if they were intergal to the holder. I downloaded the 34 page
manual at the Acu-Rite web site, was supprised at the amount of work
it took to install. Learned a lot from reading it. Also looked at
the other systems mentioned by others in this forum like snap. These
products are greatly overpriced. I am now thinking of making my own
system.
Wally K.
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com, Jon Anderson <janders@n...> wrote:
> Randy Gordon-Gilmore wrote:
> >
> > The "passive" quick change for Bridgeport R-8 is Mach 1 from Acu-
Rite.
>
> This is a fairly new product, the Ultron Snap Change has been
around for
> several years at least. I've seen the Ultron setup. Uses special
holders
> and a drawbar setup. There is a centrifugal mechanism up top that
will
> not allow a release if the spindle is turning. If this mechanism
fails,
> oops....
> The Acu-Rite setup is essentially the same thing, except they use a
full
> length R8 adapter with their pull stud in the end. I talked to an
> Acu-Rite rep about this. He stated they wouldn't sell the pull
studs, as
> they needed to insure concentricity of the stud to the holder.
Might be
> true, might be BS to make more $$.
>
> I think the Acu-Rite setup would be a bit more rigid, but requires
more
> clearance to change tools. In either case, you have a bit of work
cut
> out for you should you need to fit a right angle head, or some use
some
> R8 tooling that cannot be had with the pull studs.
>
> Jon A
Discussion Thread
Wally K
2000-10-29 11:33:49 UTC
Bridgeport quick change tooling
don.pat.brock@p...
2000-10-29 12:05:41 UTC
Re: Bridgeport quick change tooling
Jerry Kimberlin
2000-10-29 12:57:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport quick change tooling
ptengin@a...
2000-10-29 13:16:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport quick change tooling
ballendo@y...
2000-10-29 14:14:39 UTC
Re: Bridgeport quick change tooling
Randy Gordon-Gilmore
2000-10-29 15:06:03 UTC
Re: Bridgeport quick change tooling
Jon Anderson
2000-10-29 17:30:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport quick change tooling
Smoke
2000-10-29 18:07:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport quick change tooling
Wally K
2000-10-29 20:54:20 UTC
Re: Bridgeport quick change tooling
Wally K
2000-10-29 20:58:44 UTC
Re: Bridgeport quick change tooling
Smoke
2000-10-29 21:31:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport quick change tooling
ptengin@a...
2000-10-30 03:32:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport quick change tooling
Smoke
2000-10-30 07:55:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Bridgeport quick change tooling
Alvaro Fogassa
2000-10-30 08:23:23 UTC
Re: Bridgeport quick change tooling
Smoke
2000-10-30 08:28:09 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport quick change tooling
Smoke
2000-10-30 08:31:17 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport quick change tooling
Wally K
2000-10-30 09:20:33 UTC
Re: Bridgeport quick change tooling
Smoke
2000-10-30 09:42:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport quick change tooling
Alvaro Fogassa
2000-10-30 13:22:19 UTC
Re: Bridgeport quick change tooling
Doug Harrison
2000-10-30 13:42:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport quick change tooling
Jerry Kimberlin
2000-10-30 17:10:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Bridgeport quick change tooling