Re: reducing the encoder line count
Posted by
Mariss Freimanis
on 2000-11-10 19:03:05 UTC
Hi, Took out my calculator, punched in 1968, hit the 1/x key.
Got .00050813 as the answer. Coincidentally .2" is 5.08 mm. Too much
of a coincidence. Sounds like a 5 pitch leadscrew to metric value,
(5/5.08 : 1968/2000).
Mariss
Got .00050813 as the answer. Coincidentally .2" is 5.08 mm. Too much
of a coincidence. Sounds like a 5 pitch leadscrew to metric value,
(5/5.08 : 1968/2000).
Mariss
> I saw these three facny looking encoders on ebay for $24.95 theset.
> Sounded like my kind of numbers. I checked w/ the company Discmerged
> into re spec. The tech went off to hunt in the vaults whenconfronted
> w/ an obsolete part number and came back and said the the unit hadcontrollers
> 1968 lines, and wondered why anyone would want that, but there you
> had it.
>
> I just assumed that commonly available software / motion
> wouldn't like this oddball number, but I thought I'd buy em anyway.your
> They look like the kind of thing that would cost $$249.50 each,
> tax dollars at waste. So if it turns out they can be used as is,well
> so much the better. They've A,B,not A, not B, index, etc.
>
> -Jack
Discussion Thread
jmw@c...
2000-11-10 18:45:18 UTC
reducing the encoder line count
Mariss Freimanis
2000-11-10 19:03:05 UTC
Re: reducing the encoder line count
jmw@c...
2000-11-10 21:59:36 UTC
Re: reducing the encoder line count
Jon Elson
2000-11-10 23:22:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] reducing the encoder line count
ballendo@y...
2000-11-11 04:41:32 UTC
Re: reducing the encoder line count
Scott Nelson
2000-11-11 04:53:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] reducing the encoder line count
Jon Elson
2000-11-11 21:40:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] reducing the encoder line count
R. T. Robbins
2000-11-13 15:21:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] reducing the encoder line count