CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] reducing the encoder line count

Posted by Jon Elson
on 2000-11-11 21:40:14 UTC
Scott Nelson wrote:

> I think I need to toss a little bit in on the P-W Tape-O-Matic. I am an
> engineering type out of the aerospace arena and we had lots of these around.
> I think the last ones I used were '62 models. They did indeed have the
> encoder on the opposite end of the shaft. It was under a simple cover and
> just a basic plastic wheel about 4" in diameter that ran between a reader
> head. The machines worked very well for what they were designed to do. That
> is the thing they were not mills but drilling machines. They positioned the
> table and waited until the operator cycled the quill then moved on.

Ahh, this is a totally different situation from a milling machine! This is what
is called a "positioning" drive, rather than an "interpolating" drive. The
servo bandwidth requirements are much less for a positioning drive, and
so the problem with oscillation is much less.

Jon

Discussion Thread

jmw@c... 2000-11-10 18:45:18 UTC reducing the encoder line count Mariss Freimanis 2000-11-10 19:03:05 UTC Re: reducing the encoder line count jmw@c... 2000-11-10 21:59:36 UTC Re: reducing the encoder line count Jon Elson 2000-11-10 23:22:14 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] reducing the encoder line count ballendo@y... 2000-11-11 04:41:32 UTC Re: reducing the encoder line count Scott Nelson 2000-11-11 04:53:15 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] reducing the encoder line count Jon Elson 2000-11-11 21:40:14 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] reducing the encoder line count R. T. Robbins 2000-11-13 15:21:14 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] reducing the encoder line count