Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] reducing the encoder line count
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2000-11-11 21:40:14 UTC
Scott Nelson wrote:
is called a "positioning" drive, rather than an "interpolating" drive. The
servo bandwidth requirements are much less for a positioning drive, and
so the problem with oscillation is much less.
Jon
> I think I need to toss a little bit in on the P-W Tape-O-Matic. I am anAhh, this is a totally different situation from a milling machine! This is what
> engineering type out of the aerospace arena and we had lots of these around.
> I think the last ones I used were '62 models. They did indeed have the
> encoder on the opposite end of the shaft. It was under a simple cover and
> just a basic plastic wheel about 4" in diameter that ran between a reader
> head. The machines worked very well for what they were designed to do. That
> is the thing they were not mills but drilling machines. They positioned the
> table and waited until the operator cycled the quill then moved on.
is called a "positioning" drive, rather than an "interpolating" drive. The
servo bandwidth requirements are much less for a positioning drive, and
so the problem with oscillation is much less.
Jon
Discussion Thread
jmw@c...
2000-11-10 18:45:18 UTC
reducing the encoder line count
Mariss Freimanis
2000-11-10 19:03:05 UTC
Re: reducing the encoder line count
jmw@c...
2000-11-10 21:59:36 UTC
Re: reducing the encoder line count
Jon Elson
2000-11-10 23:22:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] reducing the encoder line count
ballendo@y...
2000-11-11 04:41:32 UTC
Re: reducing the encoder line count
Scott Nelson
2000-11-11 04:53:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] reducing the encoder line count
Jon Elson
2000-11-11 21:40:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] reducing the encoder line count
R. T. Robbins
2000-11-13 15:21:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] reducing the encoder line count