Re: reducing the encoder line count
Posted by
ballendo@y...
on 2000-11-11 04:41:32 UTC
Jack wrote:
Coincidence? No. Just another case of opportunity meeting
preparation. With a good dose of experience thrown in. The "1968"
rang out to me also, and I'm sure many others out there... NOT to
take ANYTHING away from Mariss, of course! Nice work.
Ballendo
>Mariss--I gotta tell you--I never would have thought of that in aJack,
>million years. It is quite a coincidence.
Coincidence? No. Just another case of opportunity meeting
preparation. With a good dose of experience thrown in. The "1968"
rang out to me also, and I'm sure many others out there... NOT to
take ANYTHING away from Mariss, of course! Nice work.
Ballendo
Discussion Thread
jmw@c...
2000-11-10 18:45:18 UTC
reducing the encoder line count
Mariss Freimanis
2000-11-10 19:03:05 UTC
Re: reducing the encoder line count
jmw@c...
2000-11-10 21:59:36 UTC
Re: reducing the encoder line count
Jon Elson
2000-11-10 23:22:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] reducing the encoder line count
ballendo@y...
2000-11-11 04:41:32 UTC
Re: reducing the encoder line count
Scott Nelson
2000-11-11 04:53:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] reducing the encoder line count
Jon Elson
2000-11-11 21:40:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] reducing the encoder line count
R. T. Robbins
2000-11-13 15:21:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] reducing the encoder line count