Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
Posted by
Ted Robbins
on 1999-07-17 20:08:47 UTC
Scott,
Your discriptions are the most to the point, how to do it, how to stay out
of trouble on this subject so far, and the contributions from others in
this list are improved by responding to your comments and the questions
they elicit.
Please keep it up and forget stage fright. You have a rapt audience.
Your discriptions are the most to the point, how to do it, how to stay out
of trouble on this subject so far, and the contributions from others in
this list are improved by responding to your comments and the questions
they elicit.
Please keep it up and forget stage fright. You have a rapt audience.
>Scott Acorn wrote:
>
>> From: Scott Acorn <sacorn@...>
>>
>> Hi Tim
>> Well its a long story !
>> The machine i have is the result of about 5yr. of design and dev.
Discussion Thread
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-15 22:38:57 UTC
EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
Scott Acorn
1999-07-16 15:11:42 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
garfield@x...
1999-07-16 15:48:53 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
TADGUNINC@x...
1999-07-16 18:15:41 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
George Potter
1999-07-16 22:57:53 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
Ian W. Wright
1999-07-17 01:19:24 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
PTENGIN@x...
1999-07-17 02:51:14 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
Bill Phillips
1999-07-17 12:58:06 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
Scott Acorn
1999-07-17 17:20:35 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
Jim GREGG
1999-07-17 18:25:03 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
John Grant
1999-07-17 19:48:27 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
Scott Acorn
1999-07-17 19:03:27 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
Ted Robbins
1999-07-17 20:08:47 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
Bill Phillips
1999-07-18 13:37:59 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
Scott Acorn
1999-07-21 17:53:26 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders