Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
Posted by
George Potter
on 1999-07-16 22:57:53 UTC
Hi Scott,
Just to let you know the others wern't kidding, I'm another lurker
extremely interested in EDM, as you have built.
Regards,
George Potter
Scott Acorn wrote:
Just to let you know the others wern't kidding, I'm another lurker
extremely interested in EDM, as you have built.
Regards,
George Potter
Scott Acorn wrote:
> From: Scott Acorn <sacorn@...>
>
> Hi Tim
> Well its a long story !
> The machine i have is the result of about 5yr. of design and dev.
Discussion Thread
Tim Goldstein
1999-07-15 22:38:57 UTC
EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
Scott Acorn
1999-07-16 15:11:42 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
garfield@x...
1999-07-16 15:48:53 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
TADGUNINC@x...
1999-07-16 18:15:41 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
George Potter
1999-07-16 22:57:53 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
Ian W. Wright
1999-07-17 01:19:24 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
PTENGIN@x...
1999-07-17 02:51:14 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
Bill Phillips
1999-07-17 12:58:06 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
Scott Acorn
1999-07-17 17:20:35 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
Jim GREGG
1999-07-17 18:25:03 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
John Grant
1999-07-17 19:48:27 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
Scott Acorn
1999-07-17 19:03:27 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
Ted Robbins
1999-07-17 20:08:47 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
Bill Phillips
1999-07-18 13:37:59 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders
Scott Acorn
1999-07-21 17:53:26 UTC
Re: EDM, was Re: Cheap Encoders