Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Posted by
Wally K
on 2000-12-10 10:30:11 UTC
Jon Elson <jmelson@a...> wrote:
I need a little help understanding your overall concept here. From
what you say in this post and trying to remember what you said in
previous posts. Is the $126 configuration all that is needed for
stepper control for 4 axis. Or are other cards needed. You have
talked about a motherboard with 8 slots in other posts, is this $126
card the motherboard. Are the 8 plug in cards you talked about for
servo control only.
Wally K.
>I did not follow you here. What is a LS7166 and 7266.
> > Wally K. wrote:
> > This was kind of what i was getting at. You have made a specific
> > design for 1 customer and now everyone has to live with those
> > wants and needs.
> Jon Replys:
> Yes, but so did the guys who designed the LS7166 and 7266.
>
> >basic
> > > >Wally K wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 3) it will be fairly expensive. From memory $350.00 or so.
> > >
> > >Jon Elson wrote:
> > >
> > > The particular customer wanted nice Phoenix Contact plug-in
> > > terminal blocks, and some other stuff that ran up the cost, also
> > > needed differential input option, etc...
> > >
> > > A different design should be able to be done using the same
> > > chip such that the entire counter and rate generator would fiton
> > > one board. I think the only other part would be the crystalyour
> > > oscillator. We also did a fancy 8-slot motherboard for these
> > > cards, but again, there are much cheaper ways to go, like
> > > eliminating the gold card edge fingers.
> > >
> > > These prices were based on buying 15 PC boards, first time
> > > (so it incurs the setup charge) and parts for about 5 of each
> > > board. Even small increases in volume make a big difference,
> > > especially in the PC board cost.
> > >
> >
> > Wally K. replys:
> >
> > Jon you have been with this group far longer than i have. From
> > experience with this group wouldn't you say the people here range$800.00
> > from thrifty to cheap (not that there is anything wrong with being
> > either).
> >
> > After reading Matt Shaver's post about selling this unit for
> > to $1000.00 i darn near fell off of my chair. I would say withthat
> > price Matt has put this control out of reach of at least 90% ofthe
> > people that would want it.if i
> >
> > I would really like to see your schematic of this control with the
> > sections needed for stepper control marked. I would like to see
> > could make a new layout and or make different component choicesfor a
> > low cost stepper control.revise
> Jon Replys
> The first batch of boards cost $57 each! Now, if we don't need to
> them, and we buy a larger quantity on a reorder, we save a bundle!although
> About the only component change you can make is the terminal
> strips. There are $36 of Phoenix Contact pluggable screw terminals
> on this version. Much cheaper terminals should be available,
> these are 2.5 mm spacing in this design. The only other expensivemodule.
> part is the Xilinx XCS10-PC84C FPGA, at $18.10 (and I was forced
> to buy 15 of them!) There is a $6 SPROM to load the configuration
> into the FPGA, one 74HC00 gate for startup and a crystal oscillator
> That's all there is on the board, if you don't want differentialinputs.
> This and a few decoupling caps comes to $126 - it adds up quick.generator.
>
> I added a few extra traces on the board so that the same board could
> be used with a different chip configuration as a 4-channel rate
> That is still a concept only, but I'm pretty sure I can make itwork in
> the same FPGA.Wally Replys:
>
> Jon
>
I need a little help understanding your overall concept here. From
what you say in this post and trying to remember what you said in
previous posts. Is the $126 configuration all that is needed for
stepper control for 4 axis. Or are other cards needed. You have
talked about a motherboard with 8 slots in other posts, is this $126
card the motherboard. Are the 8 plug in cards you talked about for
servo control only.
Wally K.
Discussion Thread
Jeff Barlow
2000-12-08 16:14:56 UTC
PC based CNC system architecture
Mike Gann
2000-12-08 16:39:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PC based CNC system architecture
Jeff Barlow
2000-12-08 17:32:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PC based CNC system architecture
Wally K
2000-12-08 17:41:26 UTC
Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Mariss Freimanis
2000-12-08 18:30:56 UTC
Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Mike Gann
2000-12-08 20:14:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Tim Goldstein
2000-12-08 20:18:49 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Jon Elson
2000-12-08 23:08:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Matt Shaver
2000-12-08 23:38:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Wally K
2000-12-09 03:01:46 UTC
Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Steve Stallings
2000-12-09 05:39:23 UTC
RE: PC based CNC system architecture
John Beidl
2000-12-09 07:11:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: PC based CNC system architecture
Smoke
2000-12-09 08:30:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: PC based CNC system architecture
cnc002@a...
2000-12-09 17:47:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PC based CNC system architecture
Jon Elson
2000-12-09 22:41:54 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Jon Elson
2000-12-09 22:59:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: PC based CNC system architecture
Matt Shaver
2000-12-10 03:25:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PC based CNC system architecture
John Beidl
2000-12-10 04:42:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: PC based CNC system architecture
Wally K
2000-12-10 10:30:11 UTC
Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Wally K
2000-12-10 10:50:22 UTC
Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Tim Goldstein
2000-12-10 11:15:37 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Matt Shaver
2000-12-10 17:27:23 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Wally K
2000-12-10 19:37:11 UTC
Re: PC based CNC system architecture
ballendo@y...
2000-12-10 21:27:09 UTC
Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Matt Shaver
2000-12-10 21:45:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Jon Elson
2000-12-10 22:28:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Jon Elson
2000-12-10 23:01:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Jon Elson
2000-12-11 00:20:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Jon Elson
2000-12-11 00:23:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: PC based CNC system architecture
Wally K
2000-12-11 02:15:37 UTC
Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Wally K
2000-12-11 02:38:34 UTC
Re: PC based CNC system architecture
ballendo@y...
2000-12-11 03:16:28 UTC
re: Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Wally K
2000-12-11 03:28:44 UTC
Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Wally K
2000-12-11 04:27:45 UTC
Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Jon Elson
2000-12-11 13:06:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Wally K
2000-12-11 14:02:30 UTC
Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Jon Elson
2000-12-11 16:14:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Wally K
2000-12-11 20:27:00 UTC
Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Jon Elson
2000-12-11 22:03:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Jon Elson
2000-12-11 22:38:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Matt Shaver
2000-12-11 22:40:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PC based CNC system architecture
dave engvall
2000-12-12 08:44:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2000-12-12 10:39:05 UTC
Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Greg Nuspel
2000-12-12 10:40:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PC based CNC system architecture
cnc002@a...
2000-12-12 13:13:10 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PC based CNC system architecture
Jon Elson
2000-12-12 16:30:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PC based CNC system architecture