CAD CAM EDM DRO - Yahoo Group Archive

re:smart box command set

Posted by ballendo@y...
on 2000-12-10 20:12:40 UTC
Wally K wrote:
>If you want to make the box smart, then make it smart. Start by
>making it accept Gcodes and Mcodes. Use the machinery and tool
>handbook for the command set and descriptions of commands. Later
>add mfg specific Gcodes as required.

Wally,

This is a bad idea, IMO. Bad partitioning of the problem, as Jeff B
might say. The gcodes are not well defined and standardised enough to
be a good command set. The specific source you mention, Machinerys'
Handbook, is at least several years out of touch, even in their
latest, 27th edition!

In addition, I don't believe that we should be trying to make the
smart box THAT smart. Doing so will exponentially increase the time,
effort, and confusion already inherant in a project such as this. We
already have a PC!

Hope this helps.

Ballendo

P.S. In every product, it is a good idea to find the "crossover"
point where expenditure of resources stops having a direct
relationship with results. In other words, the point where you stop
getting out as much as you are putting in...

Making a smart box that accepts G&M codes is just another way of
saying make a CNC control. This CONSIDERABLY ups the 'ante' AND
considerably reduces the benefits for a LARGE number of people, IMO.

Discussion Thread

ballendo@y... 2000-12-10 20:12:40 UTC re:smart box command set Mariss Freimanis 2000-12-10 21:28:56 UTC Re: re:smart box command set Smoke 2000-12-10 22:33:02 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:smart box command set Alan Marconett KM6VV 2000-12-11 11:08:33 UTC re:smart box command set ballendo@y... 2000-12-11 15:49:25 UTC re:re:smart box command set Doug Harrison 2000-12-11 20:09:48 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:re:smart box command set Brian Pitt 2000-12-11 23:49:50 UTC Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:re:smart box command set