Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re: Re: more horsepower (defs)
Posted by
Doug Harrison
on 2000-12-27 19:53:59 UTC
----- Original Message -----
From: <ballendo@...>
> Lets assume 825 lbs. load on the line. It's hi-strength stuff :-)
> We have 825 lbs. acting against a lever of .0004583 length. The hi-
> strength 'line' has NO diameter! This is some good stuff!:-)
You must be referring to Unobtanium. Infinite strength, no mass, follows
Hooke's law to infinity and has variable Young's modulus to suit the
occasion. Every engineering school keeps this stuff on hand. I still
wonder why McMaster doesn't sell it.
Doug
Discussion Thread
ballendo@y...
2000-12-27 13:21:21 UTC
more horsepower (defs)
Jon Elson
2000-12-27 16:40:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] more horsepower (defs)
ballendo@y...
2000-12-27 18:13:25 UTC
Re: more horsepower (defs)
Jerry Kimberlin
2000-12-27 18:35:12 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: more horsepower (defs)
ballendo@y...
2000-12-27 19:10:58 UTC
re: Re: more horsepower (defs)
Al Lenz
2000-12-27 19:15:34 UTC
Re: more horsepower (defs)
ballendo@y...
2000-12-27 19:21:50 UTC
Re: Re: more horsepower (defs)
ballendo@y...
2000-12-27 19:28:09 UTC
re:Re: more horsepower (defs)
Doug Harrison
2000-12-27 19:53:59 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re: Re: more horsepower (defs)
Doug Harrison
2000-12-27 19:54:03 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: more horsepower (defs)
Doug Harrison
2000-12-27 20:01:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: more horsepower (defs)
JanRwl@A...
2000-12-27 20:30:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: more horsepower (defs)
Smoke
2000-12-27 21:06:26 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re: Re: more horsepower (defs)
ballendo@y...
2000-12-27 23:43:14 UTC
RE: Re: re: Re: more horsepower (defs)
Chris Hellyar
2000-12-28 01:50:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] RE: Re: re: Re: more horsepower (defs)