Re: Microstepping
Posted by
Roman Black
on 2001-01-10 06:14:33 UTC
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@egroups.com, "Ian Wright" <Ian@i...> wrote:
a synchronous AC motor provided the 2 AC
waveforms are 90' opposed and the drive is
current regulated rather than voltage.
Our new product uses sophisticated "current
slewing" at lower speeds where the computer
chip in the driver "ramps" the current from
one microstep to the next. The inbuilt computer
adjusts the ramp speed to suit the current
motor speed and allows for standard acceleration
rates etc. At lower speeds the motor is fed
with an almost perfect sinewave.
This give phenomenal performance, with full
torque but no "steps". Noiseless and without
resonance, and with 8x resolution over full
stepping. About as close to a servo as you get,
but only open loop of course.
You will see a lot of this new technology hit
the mills fairly soon, cheap high speed
embedded micros are allowing the perfect
stepper technology to become a reality. :o)
-Roman
PS. Possibly the hardest bit will be the
re-learning needed within the die hard
"microstepping doesn't work" crowd! ;o)
> Hi,two-pennorth for
>
> Since I haven't seen a 'technical' reply yet, I'll add my
> what its worth.coil in
>
> If I understand it right the principle is as follows:-
> In a 'normal' stepper driver, a fixed voltage is applied to each
> turn but in alternating directions. This makes the adjoiningpolepieces in
> the motor'flip' from one magnetic state to the other - i.e. eitherNorth or
> South poles of equal strength. This makes the motor move in definitejerks
> or 'full steps'.that the
> Now, in a microstepping drive, the same principle applies except
> voltages applied to the poles are not equal. So, rather than alwaysapplying
> full voltage to the windings, the voltage is reduced so that onewinding
> might get, say, 3/4 the voltage while the other gets 1/4. Doing thismeans
> that, rather than the armature flipping completely from onepolepiece to the
> next, the relative difference in magnetic strength fo the poles willmake
> the armature turn only 1/4 step and 'hover' between the poles. Thenext step
> would be produced by altering the voltages to 1/2 - 1/2 and then 1/4- 3/4
> before the next full voltage change produces the full step.will
>
> I may not have the technicalities exactly right but I'm sure others
> correct me. I think this is usually still done as discrete stepsbut, if a
> true sine wave is applied, the motor should run as a synchronousmotor.
> I may be wrong???No, you're right! A stepper will run well as
a synchronous AC motor provided the 2 AC
waveforms are 90' opposed and the drive is
current regulated rather than voltage.
Our new product uses sophisticated "current
slewing" at lower speeds where the computer
chip in the driver "ramps" the current from
one microstep to the next. The inbuilt computer
adjusts the ramp speed to suit the current
motor speed and allows for standard acceleration
rates etc. At lower speeds the motor is fed
with an almost perfect sinewave.
This give phenomenal performance, with full
torque but no "steps". Noiseless and without
resonance, and with 8x resolution over full
stepping. About as close to a servo as you get,
but only open loop of course.
You will see a lot of this new technology hit
the mills fairly soon, cheap high speed
embedded micros are allowing the perfect
stepper technology to become a reality. :o)
-Roman
PS. Possibly the hardest bit will be the
re-learning needed within the die hard
"microstepping doesn't work" crowd! ;o)
Discussion Thread
Steve Greenfield
2001-01-09 16:12:10 UTC
Microstepping
Joe Vicars
2001-01-09 17:20:56 UTC
Re: Microstepping
Derek B.
2001-01-09 18:02:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Microstepping
Tim Goldstein
2001-01-09 18:30:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Microstepping
Ian Wright
2001-01-10 02:26:13 UTC
Microstepping
Roman Black
2001-01-10 05:37:13 UTC
Re: Microstepping
Roman Black
2001-01-10 06:14:33 UTC
Re: Microstepping
JanRwl@A...
2001-01-10 16:54:47 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Microstepping
P. J. Hicks
2002-11-30 14:17:04 UTC
Microstepping
Tim Goldstein
2002-11-30 14:23:46 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Microstepping
aussiedude
2002-11-30 14:29:48 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Microstepping
jeffalanp
2002-11-30 15:18:40 UTC
Re: Microstepping
mariss92705
2002-11-30 15:20:21 UTC
Re: Microstepping
Chris L
2002-11-30 15:35:25 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Microstepping
P. J. Hicks
2002-12-01 09:37:04 UTC
Microstepping