re:Re: G92 and M99 code/cncpro
Posted by
alieron@h...
on 2001-01-30 00:03:33 UTC
hey you guys, thanks for all the heli on this subject! So far using
the subroutines way has worked out best and I am starting to pick up
on it. I will give the others a try tomorrow and report. I also don't
think the reason the Z axis moves down is due to the reason you said
smoke. Not sure, but if I did not include it in the parameters of G81
then the code would be incomplete?? Will give it try. I wonder if it
is a cncpro prob. Ballando you said this is one reason you stopped
using cncpro,,,,any others??? what do you use now?
thanks again guys
tauseef
the subroutines way has worked out best and I am starting to pick up
on it. I will give the others a try tomorrow and report. I also don't
think the reason the Z axis moves down is due to the reason you said
smoke. Not sure, but if I did not include it in the parameters of G81
then the code would be incomplete?? Will give it try. I wonder if it
is a cncpro prob. Ballando you said this is one reason you stopped
using cncpro,,,,any others??? what do you use now?
thanks again guys
tauseef
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., ballendo@y... wrote:
> Smoke,
>
> Gotta disagree. The block format of the G81 code is correct. For it
> to happen the way you suggest means that the R (release, or
clearance
> plane) is shifting down also. This "should NOT" happen!
>
> In other words, each drill cycle returns to a fixed plane at .5
units
> above the material surface (assuming zero is at material surface).
> Then at the next cycle it will again go down (in Z) 1 unit into the
> material. The G91 is there so that the "whole drill cycle" will
move
> 5 units in x each iteration.
>
> Gcode experts, Have I got that right?
>
> Ballendo
>
>
> >The reason your spindle moves down during the move is because you
> >have a Z-1 move included WITHIN the parameters for the G91 move.
> >Move the Z-1 motion to a separate line PRECEDING the G91 command.
> >That should fix it.
> >Smoke
>
> >> G91 (makes measurement relative)
> >> G81 R.5 Z-1 X5 L50
> >>tauseef
Discussion Thread
alieron@h...
2001-01-27 04:22:25 UTC
G92 and M99 code uses?
Marcus & Eva
2001-01-27 06:58:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G92 and M99 code uses?
cnc002@a...
2001-01-27 08:56:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G92 and M99 code uses?
Brian Pitt
2001-01-27 14:45:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] G92 and M99 code uses?
alieron@h...
2001-01-27 17:14:34 UTC
Re: G92 and M99 code uses?
alieron@h...
2001-01-28 01:33:46 UTC
Re: G92 and M99 code/cncpro
carlcnc@s...
2001-01-28 08:56:14 UTC
Re: G92 and M99 code uses?
alieron@h...
2001-01-29 00:52:34 UTC
Re: G92 and M99 code/cncpro
alieron@h...
2001-01-29 01:17:18 UTC
Re: G92 and M99 code/cncpro
Smoke
2001-01-29 11:30:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G92 and M99 code/cncpro
Vance Buhler
2001-01-29 11:43:39 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: G92 and M99 code/cncpro
ballendo@y...
2001-01-29 14:27:36 UTC
re:G92 and M99 code uses?
ballendo@y...
2001-01-29 19:49:18 UTC
re:Re: G92 and M99 code/cncpro
ballendo@y...
2001-01-29 20:21:31 UTC
re:Re: G92 and M99 code/cncpro
alieron@h...
2001-01-30 00:03:33 UTC
re:Re: G92 and M99 code/cncpro
Carey L. Culpepper
2001-01-30 07:29:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: G92 and M99 code/cncpro
ballendo@y...
2001-01-31 01:49:53 UTC
re:Re: G92 and M99 code/cncpro
Carey L. Culpepper
2001-01-31 07:26:49 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: G92 and M99 code/cncpro
Robert Allen & Marsha Camp
2001-01-31 16:55:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] re:Re: G92 and M99 code/cncpro
mooseo69@y...
2001-03-27 13:52:55 UTC
Re: re:G92 and M99 code uses?
Ray
2001-03-28 06:48:14 UTC
Re: re:G92 and M99 code uses?