Re: Re: Digest Number 140
Posted by
Jon Anderson
on 1999-08-26 06:51:37 UTC
CG wrote:
setscrews. They do not dent, as little actual torque is applied to them.
They do however, bend slightly. As the ano on mine slowly begines to
wear off, it's coming off the gib strips at the setscrew points first.
Main drawback to this setup is that there is a VERY fine line between
getting the minimum clearance you can run at, and binding.
Most Sherline people don't realize this, but the plastic gib is really
pretty warped. Take the time to scrape it in so it makes full contact,
and you will be surprised how rigid you can get the slides and still not
bind.
Jon
> Many smaller, less expensive machines just have 2, 3, or 4The flat gibs, as used by MAX, are spotfaced on the backside for the
> setscrews pushing straight in against the gib, which is does
> not seem to be as stiff (theoretically). I would think the
> set screws would start pushing dents into the gib, and the
> gibs would show wear primarily near these areas Any thoughts
> on this out there?
setscrews. They do not dent, as little actual torque is applied to them.
They do however, bend slightly. As the ano on mine slowly begines to
wear off, it's coming off the gib strips at the setscrew points first.
Main drawback to this setup is that there is a VERY fine line between
getting the minimum clearance you can run at, and binding.
Most Sherline people don't realize this, but the plastic gib is really
pretty warped. Take the time to scrape it in so it makes full contact,
and you will be surprised how rigid you can get the slides and still not
bind.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Andrew Werby
1999-08-22 04:32:16 UTC
Re: Digest Number 140
PTENGIN@x...
1999-08-22 14:07:56 UTC
Re: Digest Number 140
Jon Anderson
1999-08-22 19:40:07 UTC
Re: Digest Number 140
Steve Carlisle
1999-08-22 21:19:18 UTC
Re: Digest Number 140
Dan Mauch
1999-08-22 21:05:30 UTC
Re: Digest Number 140
Jon Anderson
1999-08-22 23:33:10 UTC
Re: Digest Number 140
CG
1999-08-24 08:08:09 UTC
RE: Digest Number 140
Ron Ginger
1999-08-25 05:41:24 UTC
Re: Digest Number 140
Jon Anderson
1999-08-25 06:55:22 UTC
Re: Re: Digest Number 140
CG
1999-08-26 05:00:43 UTC
RE: Re: Digest Number 140
Jon Anderson
1999-08-26 06:51:37 UTC
Re: Re: Digest Number 140
psp@x...
1999-08-30 13:47:53 UTC
Re: Re: Digest Number 140