Re: Digest Number 140
Posted by
Ron Ginger
on 1999-08-25 05:41:24 UTC
>The main problem I have with Sherline and MaxNC is (I believe) that theThis is not competely correct- the gib in a Sherline is a high density
>sliding parts are anodized aluminum against anodized aluminum. If this is
>true, wear will be much greater than with low-friction polymer cast onto one
>of the surfaces, especially for the speeds and loads I hope to see on my
>machine.
plastic of some kind- black and very slippery. But the other side of the
dovetial is aluminum.
ron
Discussion Thread
Andrew Werby
1999-08-22 04:32:16 UTC
Re: Digest Number 140
PTENGIN@x...
1999-08-22 14:07:56 UTC
Re: Digest Number 140
Jon Anderson
1999-08-22 19:40:07 UTC
Re: Digest Number 140
Steve Carlisle
1999-08-22 21:19:18 UTC
Re: Digest Number 140
Dan Mauch
1999-08-22 21:05:30 UTC
Re: Digest Number 140
Jon Anderson
1999-08-22 23:33:10 UTC
Re: Digest Number 140
CG
1999-08-24 08:08:09 UTC
RE: Digest Number 140
Ron Ginger
1999-08-25 05:41:24 UTC
Re: Digest Number 140
Jon Anderson
1999-08-25 06:55:22 UTC
Re: Re: Digest Number 140
CG
1999-08-26 05:00:43 UTC
RE: Re: Digest Number 140
Jon Anderson
1999-08-26 06:51:37 UTC
Re: Re: Digest Number 140
psp@x...
1999-08-30 13:47:53 UTC
Re: Re: Digest Number 140