Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Posted by
Ian Wright
on 2001-04-21 01:11:50 UTC
A number of people say they have gone through the torment of programming
PICs to drive steppers etc., so how about someone sharing their knowledge?
This is, after all, the purpose of this list and I'm sure there are others
who, like me, would love to try out a PIC circuit but don't have the time
(or, in my case, intelligence) to learn the necessary skills to program the
PIC but who could, nevertheless, build a simple programmer and the rest of
the driver circuitry if the PIC code were available. I'm not suggesting that
anyone particularly divulges any 'trade secrets' - there are probably dozens
of ways the same effect can be achieved, but, in any case, even the trade
guys may learn how to do 'better, cheaper, faster' from such shared
knowledge which would be to the advantage of us all.
Ian
--
Ian W. Wright
Sheffield UK
www.iw63.freeserve.co.uk
----- Original Message >
PICs to drive steppers etc., so how about someone sharing their knowledge?
This is, after all, the purpose of this list and I'm sure there are others
who, like me, would love to try out a PIC circuit but don't have the time
(or, in my case, intelligence) to learn the necessary skills to program the
PIC but who could, nevertheless, build a simple programmer and the rest of
the driver circuitry if the PIC code were available. I'm not suggesting that
anyone particularly divulges any 'trade secrets' - there are probably dozens
of ways the same effect can be achieved, but, in any case, even the trade
guys may learn how to do 'better, cheaper, faster' from such shared
knowledge which would be to the advantage of us all.
Ian
--
Ian W. Wright
Sheffield UK
www.iw63.freeserve.co.uk
----- Original Message >
>
> But actually having done it, actually having programmed a PIC as a
> replacement for a 297 to drive an L298 ( and others ), I can state with
> some high level of assurance that it is a non-trivial task should high
> step rates be required.
Discussion Thread
beer@s...
2001-04-20 12:01:01 UTC
Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-04-20 17:16:33 UTC
Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Larry Edington
2001-04-20 18:09:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Larry Edington
2001-04-20 18:29:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Ian Wright
2001-04-21 01:11:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
paul@a...
2001-04-21 07:23:34 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Larry Edington
2001-04-21 11:05:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Kerry
2001-04-21 17:07:33 UTC
Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Larry Edington
2001-04-21 17:39:19 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
ballendo@y...
2001-04-21 23:19:09 UTC
Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
paul@r...
2001-04-22 03:04:43 UTC
Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Ian Wright
2001-04-22 04:04:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2001-04-22 05:16:58 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Flosi Gudmundsson
2001-04-22 06:36:12 UTC
Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Tom Eldredge
2001-04-22 08:58:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Tom Eldredge
2001-04-22 08:58:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Kerry
2001-04-22 09:29:05 UTC
Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Tim Goldstein
2001-04-22 09:35:07 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Kerry
2001-04-22 10:08:04 UTC
Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Tim Goldstein
2001-04-22 10:46:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Kerry
2001-04-22 11:36:23 UTC
Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Smoke
2001-04-22 18:56:07 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-04-22 21:03:39 UTC
Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Larry Edington
2001-04-22 22:01:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Larry Edington
2001-04-22 22:03:06 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Larry Edington
2001-04-22 22:31:40 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Larry Edington
2001-04-22 22:40:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-04-22 22:51:21 UTC
Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
paul@r...
2001-04-23 03:12:55 UTC
Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Tom Eldredge
2001-04-23 18:46:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
chapmani@m...
2001-05-08 04:36:12 UTC
PICs as replacements for L297s
Dan Mauch
2001-05-08 08:36:20 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PICs as replacements for L297s
Larry Edington
2001-05-08 09:14:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] PICs as replacements for L297s
Tony Jeffree
2001-05-08 12:19:43 UTC
Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Eric Keller
2001-05-08 13:10:20 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Carol & Jerry Jankura
2001-05-08 17:45:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PICs as replacements for L297s
Larry Edington
2001-05-08 18:17:30 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: PICs as replacements for L297s