Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] feeds and speeds.
Posted by
Sven Peter, TAD S.A.
on 2001-06-03 19:02:56 UTC
Hello Ward,
I agree and disagree with you.
"Ward M." wrote:
Wrong: The 20 to 30 minutes are a theoretical value for turning inserts when you use the high values recommended from the factory
for that particular material. As soon you go below that value tool life increases drastically. This is what I was taught in
University, 2 of my suppliers (Sandvik and Kennametal) indicated the same and I proved it in my own shop frequently.
Last and least don't forget the machineability of the same materials from different suppliers vary dramatically. (Test 4140M from
Sweden against 4140 from Brazil)
machineability.
I cannot refer to others.
Sven Peter
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I agree and disagree with you.
"Ward M." wrote:
> I disagree with regards to the tool insert life. Properly cared for insertsRight: Vibration and hits are notious for carbide.
> give much longer life than 20 minutes. Shock loads, both thermal and
> mechanical, are the prime destroyers of carbide tooling. Carbide will
> certainly wear out, but after quite a bit longer than 20 min.
Wrong: The 20 to 30 minutes are a theoretical value for turning inserts when you use the high values recommended from the factory
for that particular material. As soon you go below that value tool life increases drastically. This is what I was taught in
University, 2 of my suppliers (Sandvik and Kennametal) indicated the same and I proved it in my own shop frequently.
Last and least don't forget the machineability of the same materials from different suppliers vary dramatically. (Test 4140M from
Sweden against 4140 from Brazil)
> Also noteOK
> that there is a MINIMUM chip load to be observed when using carbide. Since
> carbide is so brittle, even ground and honed inserts have a slightly rounded
> edge. The sharpest carbide inserts that I use require a minimum of 0.0015
> chip load and can take up to 0.017 IPR. Non honed or non ground inserts
> have a higher minimum chip load.
>Here in Costa Rica I get only 3000 series aluminium or 6061 T6511 or 6064 T6511. The accent is on T6511. Which indicates high
> 6061 aluminum is not too fun to machine. It is pretty gummy, and coolant,
> either mist or flood, is quite necessary for any useful metal removal rate.
> I much prefer 7075 aluminum for its machining properties as well as its
> superior mechanical properties. The drawback to 7075 is that it has lower
> corrosion resistance, although this is not a problem in most applications.
machineability.
I cannot refer to others.
> I mill 7075 at up to 75 IPM using mist coolant with Valenite's waterI agree mist on a mill and flood on the lathe work great.
> soluable coolant and a Cool-Mist sprayer. The shop does get sorta foggy
> after a few hours of cutting though. I use flood coolant for all materials
> on the lathe an this works well and doesn't have the fog up problem.
>Good Luck
> Thanks,
>
> Ward M.
>
> wardmerk@... <mailto:wardmerk@...>
Sven Peter
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Discussion Thread
dave engvall
2001-05-31 19:54:50 UTC
feeds and speeds.
Donald Brock
2001-05-31 21:29:54 UTC
Re: feeds and speeds.
dave engvall
2001-05-31 21:53:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: feeds and speeds.
Jon Elson
2001-05-31 22:28:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] feeds and speeds.
Sven Peter, TAD S.A.
2001-06-01 20:34:32 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] feeds and speeds.
yahoo@a...
2001-06-02 08:24:46 UTC
Re: feeds and speeds.
Smoke
2001-06-02 11:42:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: feeds and speeds.
Jon Elson
2001-06-02 13:31:29 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: feeds and speeds.
Ward M.
2001-06-03 14:21:21 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] feeds and speeds.
Jon Elson
2001-06-03 15:40:02 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] feeds and speeds.
dougrasmussen@c...
2001-06-03 17:20:25 UTC
Re: feeds and speeds.
Sven Peter, TAD S.A.
2001-06-03 19:02:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] feeds and speeds.