RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Posted by
Scott M. Thomas
on 2001-08-10 10:27:23 UTC
If you think about it, with 4 coils powered you really don't have one in
brake mode. Even though both ends of the coils are at the same potential
(either + or -) the semiconductors on either end can only pass current in
one direction, therefore which ever direction the back EMF generated on that
coil was flowing, one end would be always be in a high impedance state so no
braking would occur.
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan King [mailto:alan@...]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 4:10 AM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
"Scott M. Thomas" wrote:
Red is indeed floating, but take a look at say step 1, and black is
minus and orange is plus. So red is at approx 1/2 between - and +, and
approx 1/2 power in black to red coil and also orange to red coil. So
basically 3 + 2*(1/2) for a total of 4 coils powered, pretty much the
same as 4 fully powered coils with the other in brake. And since you
don't get something for nothing in either direction (in other words
things tend to even out) I would imagine that 4 fully powered coils with
one in brake is almost exactly equal to 3 fully powered coils with 2
half powered coils, that probably are about the same as two half braked
coils at the same time. Maybe a constant difference in deflection due
to the 1/2 powered coils way being centered between the coils while the
power/brake way will be pulled toward the powered coil and only braked
by the other, but in general I bet they'll be extrememly close in other
characteristics.
It really only takes 2 phases to get motion, 3 gets smoother motion,
and 5 smoother still. But with all the extra in 5, you can come up with
different patterns to run the coils, but they always tend to even out.
Any set of patterns that gets you around in 5 steps with an even pattern
ends up being the same as any other pattern that does the same. And
they all come back to the two basic modes, joined coils with 4 powered
with one in brake, or split coils with all 5 powered.
Addresses:
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
bill,
List Manager
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
brake mode. Even though both ends of the coils are at the same potential
(either + or -) the semiconductors on either end can only pass current in
one direction, therefore which ever direction the back EMF generated on that
coil was flowing, one end would be always be in a high impedance state so no
braking would occur.
-----Original Message-----
From: Alan King [mailto:alan@...]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 4:10 AM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
"Scott M. Thomas" wrote:
>but
> There must be some variation on this theme between manufacturers (or just
> plain preference) because my interpretation of Sanyo-Denki's excitation
> sequence shows three adjacent coils energized with one of the five
> connections floating.
>
> Here is the link:
> http://www.sanyo-denki.com/Servo/60mm.pdf
>
> I agree with everything that has been said and I see how this can work,
> I wonder if there is a significant advantage to having 3 or 4 windingsAh, but actually all five windings are powered in this arrangement.
> energized.
>
> Any thoughts welcomed.
>
Red is indeed floating, but take a look at say step 1, and black is
minus and orange is plus. So red is at approx 1/2 between - and +, and
approx 1/2 power in black to red coil and also orange to red coil. So
basically 3 + 2*(1/2) for a total of 4 coils powered, pretty much the
same as 4 fully powered coils with the other in brake. And since you
don't get something for nothing in either direction (in other words
things tend to even out) I would imagine that 4 fully powered coils with
one in brake is almost exactly equal to 3 fully powered coils with 2
half powered coils, that probably are about the same as two half braked
coils at the same time. Maybe a constant difference in deflection due
to the 1/2 powered coils way being centered between the coils while the
power/brake way will be pulled toward the powered coil and only braked
by the other, but in general I bet they'll be extrememly close in other
characteristics.
It really only takes 2 phases to get motion, 3 gets smoother motion,
and 5 smoother still. But with all the extra in 5, you can come up with
different patterns to run the coils, but they always tend to even out.
Any set of patterns that gets you around in 5 steps with an even pattern
ends up being the same as any other pattern that does the same. And
they all come back to the two basic modes, joined coils with 4 powered
with one in brake, or split coils with all 5 powered.
Addresses:
FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
bill,
List Manager
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Discussion Thread
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-07-27 20:36:11 UTC
Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Jon Elson
2001-07-27 23:49:28 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Tawagawa Seiki steppers
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-07-28 10:23:09 UTC
Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-07-28 10:37:37 UTC
Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-07-28 11:15:10 UTC
Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Jon Elson
2001-07-28 16:31:44 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-07-28 18:29:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Jon Elson
2001-07-28 21:26:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
brian
2001-07-30 04:53:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Carey L. Culpepper
2001-07-30 07:59:11 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Jon Elson
2001-07-30 11:18:57 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-07-30 11:26:29 UTC
Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-07-30 16:04:51 UTC
Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Jon Elson
2001-07-30 20:23:38 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-07-30 21:48:36 UTC
Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Jon Elson
2001-07-30 23:12:43 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-07-31 13:16:15 UTC
Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Scott M. Thomas
2001-07-31 14:42:23 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-07-31 15:05:28 UTC
Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
wanliker@a...
2001-07-31 19:33:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Jon Elson
2001-07-31 21:39:31 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-07-31 23:45:40 UTC
Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Ward M.
2001-07-31 23:59:41 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
alan@n...
2001-08-01 12:10:35 UTC
Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Carey L. Culpepper
2001-08-01 13:51:15 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Scott M. Thomas
2001-08-01 21:02:13 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Alan King
2001-08-01 22:06:14 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-01 22:20:36 UTC
Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Alan King
2001-08-01 23:30:45 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-02 10:25:37 UTC
Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-08-03 00:59:20 UTC
auction payment was Seiki stepper
James Owens
2001-08-04 04:53:55 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Jon Elson
2001-08-04 10:32:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Scott M. Thomas
2001-08-10 10:27:23 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Alan King
2001-08-10 15:08:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Scott M. Thomas
2001-08-10 19:29:14 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Ward M.
2001-08-10 19:40:14 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Scott M. Thomas
2001-08-10 20:04:10 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Ward M.
2001-08-10 21:14:11 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Alan King
2001-08-10 22:19:01 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Scott M. Thomas
2001-08-12 11:45:30 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Scott M. Thomas
2001-08-12 12:07:29 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
Alan King
2001-08-12 15:27:27 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Tawagawa Seiki steppers
cadcamcenter@y...
2001-08-23 14:45:25 UTC
Tawagawa Seiki steppers