Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: CNC Test File
Posted by
Jon Elson
on 2001-08-25 11:04:21 UTC
Ray wrote:
under the impression it was around 20 on a 100 MHz pentium classic.
Maybe there are some tricks with tuning the dispatch rate of the trajectory
planner or something.
Jon
>200 blocks per second?!! Wow, that is MUCH better than I thought. I was
> I have seen the EMC report completing a block in less than 0.005 seconds
> but somewhere in the range of 12-20 bps is more the norm.
>
under the impression it was around 20 on a 100 MHz pentium classic.
Maybe there are some tricks with tuning the dispatch rate of the trajectory
planner or something.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Art Fenerty
2001-08-24 15:52:03 UTC
CNC Test File
cncdxf@a...
2001-08-24 16:30:00 UTC
Re: CNC Test File
William Scalione
2001-08-24 21:27:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC Test File
Jon Elson
2001-08-24 23:26:04 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC Test File
Art Fenerty
2001-08-25 04:27:08 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC Test File
Art Fenerty
2001-08-25 04:28:56 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC Test File
Fred Smith
2001-08-25 04:46:54 UTC
Re: CNC Test File
Art Fenerty
2001-08-25 04:53:42 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CNC Test File
Art Fenerty
2001-08-25 04:58:24 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: CNC Test File
Jon Elson
2001-08-25 11:04:21 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: CNC Test File
Art Fenerty
2001-08-25 11:16:41 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: CNC Test File
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-08-25 11:18:18 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC Test File
Art Fenerty
2001-08-25 17:03:22 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC Test File
Ray
2001-08-25 17:22:31 UTC
Re: Re: Re: Re: CNC Test File
info.host@b...
2001-08-25 17:30:35 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: Re: Re: CNC Test File
Tom Eldredge
2001-08-27 10:14:50 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC Test File
Jon Elson
2001-08-27 11:39:16 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC Test File
Chris L
2001-08-27 19:38:46 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] CNC Test File