Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: CNC Test File

Jon:

Unless I'm mistaked, the BPS of emc will vary more with feedrate than
interpolation or trajectory cycles. The next block will process when the
previous block is completed in the trajectory cycle. Upping the trajectory
cycle would not do much more than increase resolution by decreasing the
velocity of trajection.
Raising the velocity to ridiculous rates will up the BPS to its max. Of
course Block size would have a lot to do with it.

( been poking around in the emc code ...stumbling like a greenhorn)
Art

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Elson" <elson@...>
To: <CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Re: CNC Test File


> Ray wrote:
>
> >
> > I have seen the EMC report completing a block in less than 0.005 seconds
> > but somewhere in the range of 12-20 bps is more the norm.
> >
>
> 200 blocks per second?!! Wow, that is MUCH better than I thought. I was
> under the impression it was around 20 on a 100 MHz pentium classic.
> Maybe there are some tricks with tuning the dispatch rate of the
trajectory
> planner or something.
>
> Jon
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>
> Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@yahoogroups.com, wanliker@...
> Moderator: jmelson@... timg@... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Manager
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>