Re: Newbie-esque problem
Posted by
andy@o...
on 2001-10-30 08:41:05 UTC
A more robust solution might be a couple of proximity switches
mounted on your fork reading a metal strip with holes in it mounted
to the shock tube at the wheel. The holder for the prox switches
would act as a guide for the metal strip. You should be able to get a
resolution of 4x the hole spacing; the minimum hole spacing depends
on the size of the prox switch. Andy
mounted on your fork reading a metal strip with holes in it mounted
to the shock tube at the wheel. The holder for the prox switches
would act as a guide for the metal strip. You should be able to get a
resolution of 4x the hole spacing; the minimum hole spacing depends
on the size of the prox switch. Andy
--- In CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y..., "Dan Mauch" <dmauch@s...> wrote:
>
> Try using a linear encoder strip from www.usdigital.com and their
7803
> chip.
> The linear strip is $2 an inch and $14 for the encoder read head.
The
> 7803 is about $4.
> Dan
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intellicorp001 [mailto:intellicorp001@m...]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 12:15 AM
> To: 'CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...'
> Subject: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Newbie-esque problem
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've been lurking around here since July. I've been getting a
feel
> for
> whats available, what I might need & what I can afford. The level of
> expertise on this board is just awesome & I'd like to thank all
those
> who
> generously contribute their time.
>
> I have a teensy problem at the moment & I wonder if I could get
some
> advice. I want to record the movement of my motorcycle front forks.
I
> have a
> recording device (pic microprocessor based) and I want to feed it
with
> positional information about what the forks are getting up to. I had
> first
> thought about a slide potentiometer but pricey much? Wow, I'm
looking to
> spend $50 not $500. Resolution wise, analog would be overkill,
steps of
> 100
> would be great, steps of 20 would be sufficient.
>
> You guys measure position all the time, admittedly with way more
> accuracy
> than I want, but can you think of a cheapy, rugged (waterproof
would be
> nice
> to have) way for me to 'read' the position of my forks ?
>
> Sorry this isn't on topic but you don't have a coffee_lounge for
> off-topic
> posts.
>
> Time is money & money is beer so there's a case of 'the beer of your
> choice'
> for the best answer.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wilson Logan.
>
>
> "Beer is good, beer is our friend".
>
>
>
> Addresses:
> FAQ: http://www.ktmarketing.com/faq.html
> FILES: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO/files/
>
> Post messages: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@y...
> Subscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-subscribe@y...
> Unsubscribe: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-unsubscribe@y...
> List owner: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO-owner@y..., wanliker@a...
> Moderator: jmelson@a... timg@k... [Moderator]
> URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO
> bill,
> List Manager
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Discussion Thread
Intellicorp001
2001-10-30 00:43:18 UTC
Newbie-esque problem
Ian Wright
2001-10-30 04:00:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Newbie-esque problem
Dan Mauch
2001-10-30 07:01:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Newbie-esque problem
roundrocktom@y...
2001-10-30 07:31:18 UTC
Re: Newbie-esque problem
andy@o...
2001-10-30 08:41:05 UTC
Re: Newbie-esque problem
Carlos Guillermo
2001-10-30 09:39:00 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Newbie-esque problem
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-10-30 11:12:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Newbie-esque problem
Jon Elson
2001-10-30 20:50:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Newbie-esque problem
Carlos Guillermo
2001-10-30 21:16:34 UTC
Fork-travel problem - missing the forest for the trees?
Intellicorp001
2001-10-31 01:33:22 UTC
Re: Newbie-esque problem
John Barnwell
2001-10-31 20:33:36 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Newbie-esque problem