Fork-travel problem - missing the forest for the trees?
Posted by
Carlos Guillermo
on 2001-10-30 21:16:34 UTC
OK - this is starting to look to me like it has the potential for
being a classic case of "missing the forest for the trees". In my
narrow-mindedness, I can hardly start to imagine what
"Intellicorp001" would want to do with all of the information that
some of the proposed solutions would generate. What end result
are you after? Why do you need to record the movement of you
motorcycle forks? Are you interested in tuning the damping, and
want to make sure you are utilizing their full stroke under
typical riding conditions? I'm just stepping back and looking at
what we're after here; it was, after all, claimed to be a "teensy"
problem.
Carlos Guillermo
VERVE Engineering & Design
-----Original Message-----
From: elson [mailto:elson]On Behalf Of Jon Elson
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:06 AM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Newbie-esque problem
Intellicorp001 wrote:
various
catalogs. Check Marlin P Jones, Mendelson, Alltronics. These are
used
as gain pots on sound and light boards. The ones for sound gain
are
log taper, but pan pots and lighting board pots are linear. I
think, for
relatively short term testing, this would be the easiest way to
go.
Another way would be a low-cost shaft encoder and the 'string'
method. You attach the encoder to one part, and a rod to the part
that moves against it. You use a fine steel cable, or even
fishing
line, and run it from the moving part, wrap it around a drum on
the
encoder shaft, and then tie it to the end of the rod with a
spring.
The spring holds the 'string' taut on the drum, and rotates the
drum
when the forks move. this could be made pretty weatherproof if
you
intend to keep it on the bike for a long time.
Jon
being a classic case of "missing the forest for the trees". In my
narrow-mindedness, I can hardly start to imagine what
"Intellicorp001" would want to do with all of the information that
some of the proposed solutions would generate. What end result
are you after? Why do you need to record the movement of you
motorcycle forks? Are you interested in tuning the damping, and
want to make sure you are utilizing their full stroke under
typical riding conditions? I'm just stepping back and looking at
what we're after here; it was, after all, claimed to be a "teensy"
problem.
Carlos Guillermo
VERVE Engineering & Design
-----Original Message-----
From: elson [mailto:elson]On Behalf Of Jon Elson
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:06 AM
To: CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Newbie-esque problem
Intellicorp001 wrote:
> Hi All,feel for
>
> I've been lurking around here since July. I've been getting a
> whats available, what I might need & what I can afford. Thelevel of
> expertise on this board is just awesome & I'd like to thank allthose who
> generously contribute their time.some
>
> I have a teensy problem at the moment & I wonder if I could get
> advice. I want to record the movement of my motorcycle frontforks. I have a
> recording device (pic microprocessor based) and I want to feedit with
> positional information about what the forks are getting up to. Ihad first
> thought about a slide potentiometer but pricey much? Wow, I'mlooking to
> spend $50 not $500. Resolution wise, analog would be overkill,steps of 100
> would be great, steps of 20 would be sufficient.more accuracy
>
> You guys measure position all the time, admittedly with way
> than I want, but can you think of a cheapy, rugged (waterproofwould be nice
> to have) way for me to 'read' the position of my forks ?off-topic
>
> Sorry this isn't on topic but you don't have a coffee_lounge for
> posts.your choice'
>
> Time is money & money is beer so there's a case of 'the beer of
> for the best answer.Slide pots up to about 8" are pretty standard items, available in
various
catalogs. Check Marlin P Jones, Mendelson, Alltronics. These are
used
as gain pots on sound and light boards. The ones for sound gain
are
log taper, but pan pots and lighting board pots are linear. I
think, for
relatively short term testing, this would be the easiest way to
go.
Another way would be a low-cost shaft encoder and the 'string'
method. You attach the encoder to one part, and a rod to the part
that moves against it. You use a fine steel cable, or even
fishing
line, and run it from the moving part, wrap it around a drum on
the
encoder shaft, and then tie it to the end of the rod with a
spring.
The spring holds the 'string' taut on the drum, and rotates the
drum
when the forks move. this could be made pretty weatherproof if
you
intend to keep it on the bike for a long time.
Jon
Discussion Thread
Intellicorp001
2001-10-30 00:43:18 UTC
Newbie-esque problem
Ian Wright
2001-10-30 04:00:37 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Newbie-esque problem
Dan Mauch
2001-10-30 07:01:28 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Newbie-esque problem
roundrocktom@y...
2001-10-30 07:31:18 UTC
Re: Newbie-esque problem
andy@o...
2001-10-30 08:41:05 UTC
Re: Newbie-esque problem
Carlos Guillermo
2001-10-30 09:39:00 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Re: Newbie-esque problem
Alan Marconett KM6VV
2001-10-30 11:12:05 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Newbie-esque problem
Jon Elson
2001-10-30 20:50:33 UTC
Re: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Newbie-esque problem
Carlos Guillermo
2001-10-30 21:16:34 UTC
Fork-travel problem - missing the forest for the trees?
Intellicorp001
2001-10-31 01:33:22 UTC
Re: Newbie-esque problem
John Barnwell
2001-10-31 20:33:36 UTC
RE: [CAD_CAM_EDM_DRO] Newbie-esque problem